1
00:00:05,069 --> 00:00:07,990
so what I'm going to do today is as I

2
00:00:07,990 --> 00:00:10,420
got at least some of the advances in the

3
00:00:10,420 --> 00:00:12,580
management of rectal cancer I'm going to

4
00:00:12,580 --> 00:00:14,199
emphasize the importance of surgical

5
00:00:14,199 --> 00:00:15,639
technique because at the end of the day

6
00:00:15,639 --> 00:00:17,110
most patients are going to need to cut

7
00:00:17,110 --> 00:00:19,600
the rectum remove I want to talk about

8
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:20,980
the evidence supporting the use of

9
00:00:20,980 --> 00:00:22,990
laparoscopic surgery I'm going to touch

10
00:00:22,990 --> 00:00:25,570
a little bit upon the use of Robotics in

11
00:00:25,570 --> 00:00:27,970
retinal cancer surgery and and also in

12
00:00:27,970 --> 00:00:30,220
some new techniques something that is

13
00:00:30,220 --> 00:00:31,360
now called transana

14
00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:37,090
DME I'm a surgeon and I had to emphasize

15
00:00:37,090 --> 00:00:40,329
a surgical technique matters this is all

16
00:00:40,329 --> 00:00:42,430
data but it just emphasized the

17
00:00:42,430 --> 00:00:44,710
variation in local recurrence among

18
00:00:44,710 --> 00:00:46,570
surgeons an institution that has been

19
00:00:46,570 --> 00:00:47,920
known for many many years

20
00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:49,870
these differences are far greater that

21
00:00:49,870 --> 00:00:51,910
the difference that we can achieve with

22
00:00:51,910 --> 00:00:53,410
neoadjuvant therapy with adjuvant

23
00:00:53,410 --> 00:00:55,690
therapy has a great impact for patients

24
00:00:55,690 --> 00:00:58,480
outcomes I think we have to credit em

25
00:00:58,480 --> 00:01:02,140
bill Hill by helping us understand why

26
00:01:02,140 --> 00:01:04,059
there was such a wide variability in

27
00:01:04,059 --> 00:01:06,040
outcomes in Beijing with rattle cancer

28
00:01:06,040 --> 00:01:07,840
he introduced the concept total

29
00:01:07,840 --> 00:01:09,670
mesorectal excision because probably

30
00:01:09,670 --> 00:01:11,649
surgeons were not following the fine

31
00:01:11,649 --> 00:01:13,179
anatomical planes when they were

32
00:01:13,179 --> 00:01:15,880
removing the rectum that combined with

33
00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:18,249
the work of pathology such as field work

34
00:01:18,249 --> 00:01:20,799
helped us tremendously to identify the

35
00:01:20,799 --> 00:01:23,409
flaws that we had in the surgery for

36
00:01:23,409 --> 00:01:25,810
rectal cancer in the 80's and 90's and

37
00:01:25,810 --> 00:01:29,380
to introduce new educational sessions

38
00:01:29,380 --> 00:01:32,229
for surgeons to improve our surgical

39
00:01:32,229 --> 00:01:35,049
technique but even today M there are

40
00:01:35,049 --> 00:01:37,149
significant variation in outcomes among

41
00:01:37,149 --> 00:01:38,829
surgeons and institutions throughout the

42
00:01:38,829 --> 00:01:42,369
world again this has been emphasized by

43
00:01:42,369 --> 00:01:45,069
studies like the Dutch trial who really

44
00:01:45,069 --> 00:01:47,499
proved that the completeness of the

45
00:01:47,499 --> 00:01:49,209
mesorectal excision the quality of the

46
00:01:49,209 --> 00:01:51,849
surgery had a tremendous impact on the

47
00:01:51,849 --> 00:01:56,709
outcomes for the patients so I think dr.

48
00:01:56,709 --> 00:01:59,049
Brown give us a very good overview of

49
00:01:59,049 --> 00:02:02,919
the use of MRI in identified risk

50
00:02:02,919 --> 00:02:04,959
different risk groups among patient with

51
00:02:04,959 --> 00:02:07,749
rectal cancer that helped us select a

52
00:02:07,749 --> 00:02:09,550
new adjuvant therapy I think in Europe

53
00:02:09,550 --> 00:02:12,460
we now identify three groups and these

54
00:02:12,460 --> 00:02:14,710
groups are treated with different

55
00:02:14,710 --> 00:02:16,620
protocols again according to the

56
00:02:16,620 --> 00:02:18,450
can local run laps of Easter metastases

57
00:02:18,450 --> 00:02:20,610
but I think what is most important from

58
00:02:20,610 --> 00:02:23,400
the surgical point of view MRI helped us

59
00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:27,120
select the operation that every patient

60
00:02:27,120 --> 00:02:29,340
requires I think in this day and age

61
00:02:29,340 --> 00:02:31,680
with the imaging that we have at our

62
00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:32,549
disposal

63
00:02:32,549 --> 00:02:34,790
patients should go to the operating room

64
00:02:34,790 --> 00:02:36,989
understanding and knowing exactly what

65
00:02:36,989 --> 00:02:38,459
type of procedures are they going to

66
00:02:38,459 --> 00:02:39,599
have and I'm going to give you some

67
00:02:39,599 --> 00:02:43,470
examples at what do we do today so this

68
00:02:43,470 --> 00:02:45,269
is a typical meal rectal cancer it will

69
00:02:45,269 --> 00:02:48,000
call it law intermediaries with which is

70
00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:49,829
not threatening the circumference or

71
00:02:49,829 --> 00:02:51,870
sexual margin and that is far enough

72
00:02:51,870 --> 00:02:53,609
from the pelvic floor and the filter

73
00:02:53,609 --> 00:02:56,340
complex to allow us to perform a total

74
00:02:56,340 --> 00:02:59,040
mesorectal exist excision with a double

75
00:02:59,040 --> 00:03:01,890
staple anastomosis distal to the tumor

76
00:03:01,890 --> 00:03:03,780
we will have enough margin to transect

77
00:03:03,780 --> 00:03:05,640
the rectum with a stapling device and

78
00:03:05,640 --> 00:03:07,950
not open in the rectum and then using

79
00:03:07,950 --> 00:03:10,140
the standard step-in devices that we use

80
00:03:10,140 --> 00:03:13,170
today to perform an end-to-end across

81
00:03:13,170 --> 00:03:15,480
anastomosis that will rest ablis the

82
00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:18,599
Bible continuity we have seen also from

83
00:03:18,599 --> 00:03:20,000
dr. abdur

84
00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:22,709
the functional of Congolese patients

85
00:03:22,709 --> 00:03:24,030
that for the most part they are

86
00:03:24,030 --> 00:03:27,060
manageable and patients are willing to

87
00:03:27,060 --> 00:03:29,900
put up with to avoid a permanent stone

88
00:03:29,900 --> 00:03:32,910
now a different story is a tumor that is

89
00:03:32,910 --> 00:03:36,299
located very low in the rectum but it's

90
00:03:36,299 --> 00:03:37,799
not involved in the pelvic floor is not

91
00:03:37,799 --> 00:03:39,419
involved in the sphincter complex and

92
00:03:39,419 --> 00:03:41,519
you know as I mentioned based on the MRI

93
00:03:41,519 --> 00:03:44,220
images obtained before or after as you

94
00:03:44,220 --> 00:03:47,010
can therapy guide us on what type of

95
00:03:47,010 --> 00:03:48,959
surgery we can perform to the patient so

96
00:03:48,959 --> 00:03:51,120
we can counsel the patient about the

97
00:03:51,120 --> 00:03:52,590
procedures that we can do and in this

98
00:03:52,590 --> 00:03:55,489
case it will be ultra low anastomosis

99
00:03:55,489 --> 00:03:57,959
ultra low resection with a coronal

100
00:03:57,959 --> 00:04:01,410
anastomosis some surgeons will go as far

101
00:04:01,410 --> 00:04:03,150
as removing the entire internal

102
00:04:03,150 --> 00:04:04,739
sphincter and perform an interest

103
00:04:04,739 --> 00:04:06,379
interest resection

104
00:04:06,379 --> 00:04:10,799
again knowing the anatomy of the pelvis

105
00:04:10,799 --> 00:04:11,910
and the location of the tumor in

106
00:04:11,910 --> 00:04:13,829
relation to all the important structures

107
00:04:13,829 --> 00:04:16,349
we can dissect from the abdomen we can

108
00:04:16,349 --> 00:04:17,940
dissect through the annals do a

109
00:04:17,940 --> 00:04:20,250
transitional extraction and then perform

110
00:04:20,250 --> 00:04:22,380
a hands-on coronal anastomosis

111
00:04:22,380 --> 00:04:26,070
we shouldn't be doing or attempting and

112
00:04:26,070 --> 00:04:28,530
stable anastomosis in this patient

113
00:04:28,530 --> 00:04:29,710
because probably we are going

114
00:04:29,710 --> 00:04:32,710
transected two more and ruin the

115
00:04:32,710 --> 00:04:34,360
possibility of a swinter saving

116
00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:36,760
procedure I'm not advocating that these

117
00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:38,410
operations should be performed in

118
00:04:38,410 --> 00:04:41,020
everyone I think it's safe are longer we

119
00:04:41,020 --> 00:04:42,970
have a negative circumference of

120
00:04:42,970 --> 00:04:45,520
resection margin as explained by Magina

121
00:04:45,520 --> 00:04:48,490
before and as long as we can get just

122
00:04:48,490 --> 00:04:50,950
about a centimeter distal to the tumor

123
00:04:50,950 --> 00:04:52,960
that's all we need from the oncological

124
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:57,490
point of view unfortunately there is one

125
00:04:57,490 --> 00:04:58,750
morbidity associate with these

126
00:04:58,750 --> 00:05:00,310
operations there is a large body of

127
00:05:00,310 --> 00:05:02,050
literature they just summarize the

128
00:05:02,050 --> 00:05:04,360
morbidity associated with it there is

129
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:07,480
also some functional outcomes that they

130
00:05:07,480 --> 00:05:09,340
are worse than the outcomes that we will

131
00:05:09,340 --> 00:05:12,790
achieve with a double staple technique

132
00:05:12,790 --> 00:05:15,460
but again many patients prefer him all

133
00:05:15,460 --> 00:05:19,030
these myriad of bowel problems to a

134
00:05:19,030 --> 00:05:21,550
permanent colostomy and also we know

135
00:05:21,550 --> 00:05:23,800
that oncological is probably safe as

136
00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:26,230
long as we can achieve negative feel

137
00:05:26,230 --> 00:05:28,480
confidential sexual margin and a distal

138
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:30,310
margin of approximately one centimeter

139
00:05:30,310 --> 00:05:34,120
or more the quality of life is debatable

140
00:05:34,120 --> 00:05:36,190
but as I mentioned even though it's

141
00:05:36,190 --> 00:05:38,410
worse than standard low anterior

142
00:05:38,410 --> 00:05:40,110
resection with the stable anastomosis

143
00:05:40,110 --> 00:05:42,610
some patients still prefer this approach

144
00:05:42,610 --> 00:05:46,270
to a abdominal analysis another rectum

145
00:05:46,270 --> 00:05:47,680
and this is an important issue that

146
00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:49,330
surgeons need to discuss with the

147
00:05:49,330 --> 00:05:51,700
patient before offering one or the other

148
00:05:51,700 --> 00:05:54,370
procedure again going back to the

149
00:05:54,370 --> 00:05:56,470
imaging the imaging is very accurate and

150
00:05:56,470 --> 00:05:58,480
in this case it will show that there is

151
00:05:58,480 --> 00:06:00,160
involvement of the elevator or the

152
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:02,290
sphincter complex and in this case as

153
00:06:02,290 --> 00:06:04,330
filter saving procedure won't be

154
00:06:04,330 --> 00:06:06,370
feasible the patients should know that

155
00:06:06,370 --> 00:06:08,320
before it goes to the operating room and

156
00:06:08,320 --> 00:06:10,360
so we should be appropriately counseled

157
00:06:10,360 --> 00:06:12,190
for that these patients are gonna

158
00:06:12,190 --> 00:06:13,960
require an abdominal analysis another

159
00:06:13,960 --> 00:06:17,710
rectum and it was also mentioned by dr.

160
00:06:17,710 --> 00:06:19,870
Brown the importance of performing this

161
00:06:19,870 --> 00:06:23,650
operation well the imaging studies is

162
00:06:23,650 --> 00:06:25,210
going to guide us about the location of

163
00:06:25,210 --> 00:06:27,070
the tumor and we need to tailor our

164
00:06:27,070 --> 00:06:29,890
operation properly we should do an

165
00:06:29,890 --> 00:06:33,490
accelerator APR removing the elevator

166
00:06:33,490 --> 00:06:36,310
Mars muscles along with the rectum and

167
00:06:36,310 --> 00:06:38,980
the mess of rectum to avoid the waste in

168
00:06:38,980 --> 00:06:40,750
the surgical specimen that has been the

169
00:06:40,750 --> 00:06:41,710
source or record

170
00:06:41,710 --> 00:06:43,930
and worse outcomes impatient with

171
00:06:43,930 --> 00:06:46,060
digital rectal cancer having abdominal

172
00:06:46,060 --> 00:06:48,640
perennial decision of the rectum this

173
00:06:48,640 --> 00:06:52,060
has been again shown elegantly in many

174
00:06:52,060 --> 00:06:56,220
different studies standard APR with

175
00:06:56,220 --> 00:06:58,270
without removing the levator muscle

176
00:06:58,270 --> 00:07:00,580
leads to more perforation and a greater

177
00:07:00,580 --> 00:07:02,140
risk of the confidential or sexual

178
00:07:02,140 --> 00:07:05,020
management there are other tumors that

179
00:07:05,020 --> 00:07:06,820
they're going to go even beyond what we

180
00:07:06,820 --> 00:07:08,320
remove in a total mesorectal excision

181
00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:10,540
and it was mentioned before that this

182
00:07:10,540 --> 00:07:13,750
will help us guide the operation and do

183
00:07:13,750 --> 00:07:15,730
a standard procedure whether it is a

184
00:07:15,730 --> 00:07:17,860
complete pelvic centration sometimes it

185
00:07:17,860 --> 00:07:20,140
will be on a pelvic ascent aeration so

186
00:07:20,140 --> 00:07:22,030
this is one of the main advances that is

187
00:07:22,030 --> 00:07:24,700
helping us to a tailor the surgical

188
00:07:24,700 --> 00:07:28,000
procedure to the tumor now one of the

189
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:33,760
main areas in in general surgery in

190
00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:35,410
general and in colorectal cancer in

191
00:07:35,410 --> 00:07:39,370
particular in the last few decades has

192
00:07:39,370 --> 00:07:40,750
been the introduction of the minimally

193
00:07:40,750 --> 00:07:43,750
invasive surgery there are a number of

194
00:07:43,750 --> 00:07:45,850
prospective randomized trials in in

195
00:07:45,850 --> 00:07:48,400
colon cancer they have proven that the

196
00:07:48,400 --> 00:07:50,650
minimally invasive approach is superior

197
00:07:50,650 --> 00:07:54,100
to the standard open approach in terms

198
00:07:54,100 --> 00:07:56,470
of patient recovery and reduce in length

199
00:07:56,470 --> 00:08:00,010
of stay in patients with colon cancer in

200
00:08:00,010 --> 00:08:04,120
particularly places that do do not need

201
00:08:04,120 --> 00:08:05,920
that conversion so patient that they are

202
00:08:05,920 --> 00:08:08,110
straight laparoscopic procedure they

203
00:08:08,110 --> 00:08:09,820
require less narcotics they have less

204
00:08:09,820 --> 00:08:12,550
pain they are discharged home faster and

205
00:08:12,550 --> 00:08:14,050
they return to work earlier than

206
00:08:14,050 --> 00:08:16,420
patients who have open surgery and this

207
00:08:16,420 --> 00:08:18,160
has been achieved without compromising

208
00:08:18,160 --> 00:08:20,800
the oncological outcomes in rectal

209
00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:22,630
cancer the story's not quite the same

210
00:08:22,630 --> 00:08:24,970
they have been so far five major

211
00:08:24,970 --> 00:08:27,250
prospective randomized trials two of

212
00:08:27,250 --> 00:08:29,920
them in Europe one in Korean to one in

213
00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:31,270
the United States and another one in

214
00:08:31,270 --> 00:08:34,809
Australia different designs radically

215
00:08:34,809 --> 00:08:36,280
different patient population but the

216
00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:38,110
message is that the compression rate is

217
00:08:38,110 --> 00:08:42,309
not insignificant at least 10% that the

218
00:08:42,309 --> 00:08:43,510
completeness of the mass of rectal

219
00:08:43,510 --> 00:08:46,060
excision is a little bit inferior at

220
00:08:46,060 --> 00:08:48,730
least in the last two trials compared to

221
00:08:48,730 --> 00:08:51,880
opened tme and that they were not a

222
00:08:51,880 --> 00:08:53,800
dramatic difference in terms of the

223
00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:54,529
length of a stage

224
00:08:54,529 --> 00:08:56,480
your patient recovery so they has put a

225
00:08:56,480 --> 00:08:59,089
little bit of a cloud in the end - she

226
00:08:59,089 --> 00:09:01,519
asked for minimally invasive surgery in

227
00:09:01,519 --> 00:09:03,939
patients with rectal cancer M

228
00:09:03,939 --> 00:09:06,709
oncological outcomes are equivalent the

229
00:09:06,709 --> 00:09:08,569
two of the studies they have reported

230
00:09:08,569 --> 00:09:10,279
already mature data in terms of

231
00:09:10,279 --> 00:09:11,689
long-term survival

232
00:09:11,689 --> 00:09:14,600
surgery doesn't seem to compromise his

233
00:09:14,600 --> 00:09:16,160
laparoscopic surgery doesn't seem to

234
00:09:16,160 --> 00:09:18,170
compromise long-term outcomes in rectal

235
00:09:18,170 --> 00:09:20,300
cancer but what they have failed to

236
00:09:20,300 --> 00:09:23,480
deliver is the improvements in outcomes

237
00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:28,339
that we have seen with colon cancer so

238
00:09:28,339 --> 00:09:30,829
again similar length of the stay mixed

239
00:09:30,829 --> 00:09:32,240
results about completeness of the

240
00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:34,009
mesorectal excision and the survival

241
00:09:34,009 --> 00:09:36,379
probably equivalent the fact of the

242
00:09:36,379 --> 00:09:39,350
matter is that a laparoscopy is rarely

243
00:09:39,350 --> 00:09:41,959
used in rectal cancer today this is data

244
00:09:41,959 --> 00:09:43,519
from the United States I don't know how

245
00:09:43,519 --> 00:09:45,499
it will be in Europe but probably not

246
00:09:45,499 --> 00:09:48,110
that different less than 10% of rectal

247
00:09:48,110 --> 00:09:50,420
cancer such we did with laparoscopic in

248
00:09:50,420 --> 00:09:53,559
the United States today and why is

249
00:09:53,559 --> 00:09:55,639
laparoscopy not widely adopted

250
00:09:55,639 --> 00:09:58,249
I think the rectal cancer surgery is

251
00:09:58,249 --> 00:09:59,720
challenging is more challenging than

252
00:09:59,720 --> 00:10:02,240
colon cancer particularly in a obese

253
00:10:02,240 --> 00:10:04,759
patient with a narrow pelvis that has a

254
00:10:04,759 --> 00:10:07,009
victim two more the resection of that

255
00:10:07,009 --> 00:10:09,170
that that type of patient and tumor is

256
00:10:09,170 --> 00:10:10,839
quite difficult laparoscopically

257
00:10:10,839 --> 00:10:13,339
laparoscopic stenick le challenging we

258
00:10:13,339 --> 00:10:15,319
work with long instrument rigid that did

259
00:10:15,319 --> 00:10:18,170
not articulate the surgical limited

260
00:10:18,170 --> 00:10:20,149
control only can have two instruments is

261
00:10:20,149 --> 00:10:22,490
very difficult to triangulate economics

262
00:10:22,490 --> 00:10:25,459
is very poor and the plataform usually

263
00:10:25,459 --> 00:10:27,769
has two-dimensional visualization you

264
00:10:27,769 --> 00:10:30,129
need to have a very good help to do

265
00:10:30,129 --> 00:10:34,009
minimally invasive surgery and more

266
00:10:34,009 --> 00:10:36,649
important and I think this stands not

267
00:10:36,649 --> 00:10:38,660
only - laparoscopy but all the aspects

268
00:10:38,660 --> 00:10:40,370
of the treatment of rectal cancer most

269
00:10:40,370 --> 00:10:42,620
rectal cancer surgeries are performed by

270
00:10:42,620 --> 00:10:45,589
surgeons who do very few cases here and

271
00:10:45,589 --> 00:10:47,689
an institution that they are considered

272
00:10:47,689 --> 00:10:50,420
to be low volume so what are the

273
00:10:50,420 --> 00:10:52,279
alternatives what are we now trying to

274
00:10:52,279 --> 00:10:54,439
do to extend the minimally invasive

275
00:10:54,439 --> 00:10:57,170
surgery to rectal cancer patients one of

276
00:10:57,170 --> 00:10:59,149
the things that we have done is the

277
00:10:59,149 --> 00:11:00,949
introduction of the robotic platform and

278
00:11:00,949 --> 00:11:02,620
I think there would be a large

279
00:11:02,620 --> 00:11:05,059
presentation tomorrow the other one is

280
00:11:05,059 --> 00:11:06,379
something that you might have be

281
00:11:06,379 --> 00:11:08,209
starting to hear about which is the

282
00:11:08,209 --> 00:11:10,879
trans Amal DME instead of going from top

283
00:11:10,879 --> 00:11:14,089
down going from bottom up to do the mess

284
00:11:14,089 --> 00:11:18,379
of rectal dissection so the robot Y the

285
00:11:18,379 --> 00:11:21,559
robot M there are many advantage of this

286
00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:23,689
platform allow us to see in three

287
00:11:23,689 --> 00:11:25,339
dimensional we have articulating

288
00:11:25,339 --> 00:11:27,319
instruments that they can scale motion

289
00:11:27,319 --> 00:11:31,459
and eliminate the tremor enhance the

290
00:11:31,459 --> 00:11:33,559
precision I think the surgeon has more

291
00:11:33,559 --> 00:11:35,389
control we can control the camera and at

292
00:11:35,389 --> 00:11:36,889
least three instruments at the same time

293
00:11:36,889 --> 00:11:39,019
and I think is much better from the

294
00:11:39,019 --> 00:11:40,370
ergonomical point of view for the

295
00:11:40,370 --> 00:11:44,720
surgeon performing the operation there

296
00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:46,339
are some disadvantages you have to dock

297
00:11:46,339 --> 00:11:48,980
and undock the device which we time is

298
00:11:48,980 --> 00:11:51,589
is something that we do quite rapid a

299
00:11:51,589 --> 00:11:53,629
they argue about the lack of tactile

300
00:11:53,629 --> 00:11:55,759
sensation which is very interesting but

301
00:11:55,759 --> 00:11:57,079
we somehow

302
00:11:57,079 --> 00:12:00,079
replace with some haptic sensation just

303
00:12:00,079 --> 00:12:02,000
by looking at the tissues and the most

304
00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:03,679
important one is the course this is a

305
00:12:03,679 --> 00:12:05,750
spensive machine that is expensive to

306
00:12:05,750 --> 00:12:07,879
maintain and has this possible that they

307
00:12:07,879 --> 00:12:10,879
also cost fair amount of money robotics

308
00:12:10,879 --> 00:12:13,250
have come a long way from the day that I

309
00:12:13,250 --> 00:12:15,620
started using this system and almost a

310
00:12:15,620 --> 00:12:18,049
decade ago on today we have gone through

311
00:12:18,049 --> 00:12:21,199
four different platforms the technology

312
00:12:21,199 --> 00:12:23,750
has improved and so has improved the

313
00:12:23,750 --> 00:12:26,420
flow of the operation we have figured

314
00:12:26,420 --> 00:12:29,149
out now how to do this operation with

315
00:12:29,149 --> 00:12:31,730
one set of instruments and at the speed

316
00:12:31,730 --> 00:12:34,069
that probably is parallel to what we do

317
00:12:34,069 --> 00:12:37,549
in open surgery there is there is a lot

318
00:12:37,549 --> 00:12:39,379
of literature about robotic surgery most

319
00:12:39,379 --> 00:12:40,759
of them they are retrospective case

320
00:12:40,759 --> 00:12:42,769
series there is only one prospective

321
00:12:42,769 --> 00:12:44,569
trial comparing laparoscopic and robotic

322
00:12:44,569 --> 00:12:47,329
but the data is not mature yet the only

323
00:12:47,329 --> 00:12:49,600
thing that we can say is that with the

324
00:12:49,600 --> 00:12:52,759
robotic platform we are able to complete

325
00:12:52,759 --> 00:12:54,559
the minimally invasive approach in more

326
00:12:54,559 --> 00:12:57,339
patients that we can use in a

327
00:12:57,339 --> 00:13:00,049
laparoscopy and that the circumferential

328
00:13:00,049 --> 00:13:01,939
sexual knowledge in the surrogate for

329
00:13:01,939 --> 00:13:04,040
the quality of the surgery is very much

330
00:13:04,040 --> 00:13:07,429
equivalent to you can do with a

331
00:13:07,429 --> 00:13:10,100
laparoscopy or open surgery at our own

332
00:13:10,100 --> 00:13:12,019
institution we have adopted robotic kind

333
00:13:12,019 --> 00:13:13,429
of enthusiastically because we have

334
00:13:13,429 --> 00:13:15,680
equipment and we have

335
00:13:15,680 --> 00:13:20,240
move towards the robotic tme we are now

336
00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:23,899
probably doing 500 cases a year and we

337
00:13:23,899 --> 00:13:25,850
have recently revealed our experience

338
00:13:25,850 --> 00:13:28,190
comparing the cases done in the last few

339
00:13:28,190 --> 00:13:28,520
years

340
00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:30,529
open laparoscopic assisting and robotic

341
00:13:30,529 --> 00:13:32,330
the only difference in this patient

342
00:13:32,330 --> 00:13:34,430
preparation is our increase use of

343
00:13:34,430 --> 00:13:37,820
induction chemotherapy in the new age of

344
00:13:37,820 --> 00:13:39,170
onset in inpatient with rectal cancer

345
00:13:39,170 --> 00:13:41,060
all the other characteristics who are

346
00:13:41,060 --> 00:13:43,940
the same the circumferential sexual

347
00:13:43,940 --> 00:13:45,410
margin in our hands you know very

348
00:13:45,410 --> 00:13:46,910
different the number of live nodes

349
00:13:46,910 --> 00:13:48,410
probably is different but I don't know

350
00:13:48,410 --> 00:13:50,899
if is clinically meaningful it takes a

351
00:13:50,899 --> 00:13:53,510
little bit longer to do robotics this

352
00:13:53,510 --> 00:13:56,149
includes our learning curve what we have

353
00:13:56,149 --> 00:13:57,740
found is that the complication rates

354
00:13:57,740 --> 00:13:59,330
particularly when it comes to

355
00:13:59,330 --> 00:14:01,399
superficial surgical site infection and

356
00:14:01,399 --> 00:14:04,190
some other complications are less we

357
00:14:04,190 --> 00:14:05,750
have been able to reduce the length of

358
00:14:05,750 --> 00:14:08,510
stay probably in two days of course at a

359
00:14:08,510 --> 00:14:11,240
significant cost we don't know if the

360
00:14:11,240 --> 00:14:14,450
cost incurred by the patient who

361
00:14:14,450 --> 00:14:16,910
developed complications because after

362
00:14:16,910 --> 00:14:19,100
this charge will offset the cost of the

363
00:14:19,100 --> 00:14:23,510
in hospital charges for the use of the

364
00:14:23,510 --> 00:14:25,279
robot we don't know yet we are working

365
00:14:25,279 --> 00:14:28,700
on that in multivariate analysis the

366
00:14:28,700 --> 00:14:31,130
robot didn't have an impact in the total

367
00:14:31,130 --> 00:14:33,140
number of complications but was

368
00:14:33,140 --> 00:14:34,940
significant in the surgical site

369
00:14:34,940 --> 00:14:36,800
infection in the length of stay and of

370
00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:38,959
course in the cost using the robot is

371
00:14:38,959 --> 00:14:41,690
more expensive we have also looked at

372
00:14:41,690 --> 00:14:43,310
the APR and even though the numbers are

373
00:14:43,310 --> 00:14:45,050
less because we don't do as many a peers

374
00:14:45,050 --> 00:14:47,029
or with early years the trend is the

375
00:14:47,029 --> 00:14:49,220
same the complication rate seems to be

376
00:14:49,220 --> 00:14:51,470
less patient seems to recover faster and

377
00:14:51,470 --> 00:14:53,510
the length of a stay is less that would

378
00:14:53,510 --> 00:14:55,940
need to be proven in a larger cohorts

379
00:14:55,940 --> 00:14:58,130
and probably one day in a prospective

380
00:14:58,130 --> 00:15:01,339
trial now what about the alternative for

381
00:15:01,339 --> 00:15:03,529
places for a surgeon who don't have

382
00:15:03,529 --> 00:15:07,130
access to the robotic platform they have

383
00:15:07,130 --> 00:15:09,320
introduced the transitional DME just

384
00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:11,240
trying to do the dissection starting at

385
00:15:11,240 --> 00:15:13,310
the rectum and moving up upwards from

386
00:15:13,310 --> 00:15:17,209
the anal canal up so we use one of the

387
00:15:17,209 --> 00:15:19,820
single port devices to use laparoscopic

388
00:15:19,820 --> 00:15:22,130
instruments get through the bowel wall

389
00:15:22,130 --> 00:15:24,140
try to find a measure of rectal plane

390
00:15:24,140 --> 00:15:26,150
and started a section through the annals

391
00:15:26,150 --> 00:15:27,020
up to

392
00:15:27,020 --> 00:15:29,420
the pelvis needless to say that today

393
00:15:29,420 --> 00:15:31,640
they needs to be another team working in

394
00:15:31,640 --> 00:15:33,290
the abdomen to control the vessels

395
00:15:33,290 --> 00:15:35,540
mobilize the colon to be able to

396
00:15:35,540 --> 00:15:37,580
complete the operation and perform the

397
00:15:37,580 --> 00:15:41,300
anastomosis why the Tata t me as I say

398
00:15:41,300 --> 00:15:43,820
for surgeons who don't have access to

399
00:15:43,820 --> 00:15:45,410
the robotic platform or not have the

400
00:15:45,410 --> 00:15:47,050
expertise or don't believe in it

401
00:15:47,050 --> 00:15:50,480
the rationale is because this posture in

402
00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:51,950
the distal rectum is quite difficult

403
00:15:51,950 --> 00:15:54,410
when we go from the abdomen following

404
00:15:54,410 --> 00:15:56,090
the plane that we used to follow in open

405
00:15:56,090 --> 00:15:59,180
surgery particularly anteriorly in very

406
00:15:59,180 --> 00:16:01,550
distal tumors is very difficult to

407
00:16:01,550 --> 00:16:04,010
visualise from above that area and it's

408
00:16:04,010 --> 00:16:06,310
easier when you go through the annals

409
00:16:06,310 --> 00:16:08,630
for very distant tumors as I mentioned

410
00:16:08,630 --> 00:16:10,190
before is difficult to transect the

411
00:16:10,190 --> 00:16:12,080
rectum using a stapling device you don't

412
00:16:12,080 --> 00:16:14,120
have an office space in another pelvis

413
00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:16,160
in a male for a very Beast of rectal

414
00:16:16,160 --> 00:16:18,680
tumor and the idea was to avoid the

415
00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:20,780
compression rate and make the

416
00:16:20,780 --> 00:16:23,590
laparoscopy more accessible to patients

417
00:16:23,590 --> 00:16:26,480
there is a lot of data this data has

418
00:16:26,480 --> 00:16:28,220
come out in the last couple years there

419
00:16:28,220 --> 00:16:29,780
is a systematic review that was

420
00:16:29,780 --> 00:16:31,910
published earlier this year with a total

421
00:16:31,910 --> 00:16:34,790
of 500 and temptations and what this

422
00:16:34,790 --> 00:16:37,130
preliminary experience tell us is that

423
00:16:37,130 --> 00:16:39,650
this is probably technically feasible in

424
00:16:39,650 --> 00:16:41,570
that this technique to keep in the

425
00:16:41,570 --> 00:16:44,210
surgical armamentarium I see some

426
00:16:44,210 --> 00:16:49,010
problems because the transitional tme do

427
00:16:49,010 --> 00:16:51,020
not eliminate the need for an access

428
00:16:51,020 --> 00:16:52,940
through the abdomen so you need to have

429
00:16:52,940 --> 00:16:54,860
two set of equipments working from above

430
00:16:54,860 --> 00:16:57,290
and from below one set of instruments to

431
00:16:57,290 --> 00:16:59,510
do the mobilization of the colon and

432
00:16:59,510 --> 00:17:02,240
another one to water from the rectum I

433
00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:03,620
don't know the impact on cost that

434
00:17:03,620 --> 00:17:06,140
hasn't been analyzed yet and requires

435
00:17:06,140 --> 00:17:08,720
opening the rectum to the pelvis with

436
00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:10,640
the possibility of contamination and in

437
00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:12,980
some cases spillage of cancer cells I

438
00:17:12,980 --> 00:17:14,569
don't know Aquila will lead to any

439
00:17:14,569 --> 00:17:17,720
problems in the future in addition it

440
00:17:17,720 --> 00:17:20,000
makes the surgeon in general to try to

441
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:23,089
perform a lower than astonishes compared

442
00:17:23,089 --> 00:17:24,410
to when you do the double stapling

443
00:17:24,410 --> 00:17:26,180
technique and that probably has been

444
00:17:26,180 --> 00:17:28,160
view as a problem because the lower the

445
00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:31,340
anastomosis the higher the risk of

446
00:17:31,340 --> 00:17:33,140
having a low anterior resection syndrome

447
00:17:33,140 --> 00:17:36,190
and probably warrants a blood count and

448
00:17:36,190 --> 00:17:38,540
there are some technical issues just

449
00:17:38,540 --> 00:17:40,290
working through the anus

450
00:17:40,290 --> 00:17:41,850
you had the instruments in parallel and

451
00:17:41,850 --> 00:17:43,740
is not that simple I think is not

452
00:17:43,740 --> 00:17:46,200
something that it will be accessible to

453
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:48,510
a surgeon who does one or two or these

454
00:17:48,510 --> 00:17:51,030
procedures every year I think we need to

455
00:17:51,030 --> 00:17:53,010
in this approach identify the

456
00:17:53,010 --> 00:17:56,430
neurovascular bundle in the area what is

457
00:17:56,430 --> 00:17:59,340
more exposed and I'm worried that we're

458
00:17:59,340 --> 00:18:01,140
gonna see more problem with the sexual

459
00:18:01,140 --> 00:18:03,990
and urinary dysfunction but I think all

460
00:18:03,990 --> 00:18:07,100
this thing needs to be improvement in

461
00:18:07,100 --> 00:18:09,570
larger studies there is already a

462
00:18:09,570 --> 00:18:11,190
prospective trial going on in Europe

463
00:18:11,190 --> 00:18:12,450
that we'll be able to answer some of

464
00:18:12,450 --> 00:18:15,210
these questions again in my opinion is

465
00:18:15,210 --> 00:18:16,680
not needed for most cancers for more

466
00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:18,780
cancers we can do is steal the traps

467
00:18:18,780 --> 00:18:21,450
abdominal approach from a bob transfer

468
00:18:21,450 --> 00:18:22,830
the rectum with a stapler and do the

469
00:18:22,830 --> 00:18:24,990
double stapling but I think is something

470
00:18:24,990 --> 00:18:26,580
that should be in the surgical

471
00:18:26,580 --> 00:18:29,520
armamentarium for some patients in whom

472
00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:31,590
as winter preservation might be

473
00:18:31,590 --> 00:18:34,230
difficult even when using the robot just

474
00:18:34,230 --> 00:18:35,160
from about

475
00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:38,030
so in summary these are some of the

476
00:18:38,030 --> 00:18:40,410
advances that I see today in the

477
00:18:40,410 --> 00:18:42,060
surgical treatment of rectal cancer I

478
00:18:42,060 --> 00:18:44,610
think the selection a base on the MRI

479
00:18:44,610 --> 00:18:47,100
imaging is critical as I said before no

480
00:18:47,100 --> 00:18:48,660
patients should go to the operating room

481
00:18:48,660 --> 00:18:50,280
without knowing what type of procedure

482
00:18:50,280 --> 00:18:53,400
you can have I think medically minimally

483
00:18:53,400 --> 00:18:55,290
invasive is decidable patient recover

484
00:18:55,290 --> 00:18:57,660
faster patients get less complications

485
00:18:57,660 --> 00:19:01,650
and return to work easier but I think

486
00:19:01,650 --> 00:19:03,510
it's technically challenging I think the

487
00:19:03,510 --> 00:19:06,840
robotic plataform my help we hope that

488
00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:08,570
the cost of this instrument will be

489
00:19:08,570 --> 00:19:11,160
reduced in the future and I think that

490
00:19:11,160 --> 00:19:14,360
data tme is also a useful tool that

491
00:19:14,360 --> 00:19:17,400
needs sometimes to find a place in our

492
00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:21,440
surgical armamentarium thank you


