1
00:00:17,087 --> 00:00:20,397
DALEK:
<i>Eliminate all humans! Exterminate!</i>

2
00:00:25,487 --> 00:00:28,524
<i>Eliminate all humans! Exterminate!</i>

3
00:00:29,687 --> 00:00:31,917
NARRATOR:
The Day of the Daleks: Special Edition

4
00:00:32,007 --> 00:00:34,680
<i>is the result of many hours</i>
<i>of intensive work</i>

5
00:00:34,767 --> 00:00:37,201
<i>from a small group of</i>
<i>talented individuals.</i>

6
00:00:37,287 --> 00:00:39,403
<i>Working to a very tight budget,</i>

7
00:00:39,527 --> 00:00:44,123
<i>a variety of methods have been employed</i>
<i>to bring the 22nd century to life.</i>

8
00:00:44,207 --> 00:00:47,802
<i>In an attempt to be true</i>
<i>to the spirit of the original episodes,</i>

9
00:00:47,887 --> 00:00:51,675
<i>new material has been shot using</i>
<i>vintage 1970s film cameras.</i>

10
00:00:52,407 --> 00:00:54,841
<i>Modern digital techniques</i>
<i>have been used</i>

11
00:00:54,927 --> 00:00:57,157
<i>to sympathetically improve</i>
<i>visual effects,</i>

12
00:00:57,247 --> 00:00:59,715
<i>to restore errors</i>
<i>in the original programme making,</i>

13
00:00:59,807 --> 00:01:02,480
<i>and to create an impressive</i>
<i>new soundscape.</i>

14
00:01:10,327 --> 00:01:12,887
I think it would be safe to say
that all the producers

15
00:01:12,967 --> 00:01:15,879
on the <i>Doctor Who</i> DVD range
have had a sort of pet story

16
00:01:15,967 --> 00:01:18,527
that they would have wanted to
do the extras for.

17
00:01:18,607 --> 00:01:22,156
And for me, it was "Day of the Daleks",
which was the story that

18
00:01:22,247 --> 00:01:24,886
got me hooked on <i>Doctor Who</i>
as a six-year-old in 1972.

19
00:01:25,007 --> 00:01:27,362
It was, uh...
I thought it was terrific at the time.

20
00:01:27,447 --> 00:01:30,598
It lived with me for many years.
So, when the opportunity came,

21
00:01:30,687 --> 00:01:33,884
and I heard that Dan Hall was
commissioning extras for this one,

22
00:01:34,007 --> 00:01:36,202
well, I made sure that I got the gig.

23
00:01:40,207 --> 00:01:42,721
Having been commissioned to do
the extras for "Day of the Daleks",

24
00:01:42,807 --> 00:01:47,039
I decided to go down to
Dropmore Park in Buckinghamshire,

25
00:01:47,127 --> 00:01:49,197
which was the original location
for Auderly House,

26
00:01:49,287 --> 00:01:51,642
to shoot some background plates
for the interviews.

27
00:01:53,927 --> 00:01:56,487
I looked around,
saw how fantastic the place looked,

28
00:01:56,567 --> 00:02:00,799
and decided that maybe there was
an option for a Special Edition.

29
00:02:04,687 --> 00:02:08,282
I don't think the idea of doing
new effects was seriously in my mind

30
00:02:08,367 --> 00:02:10,323
until I went along to see Dropmore Park.

31
00:02:10,407 --> 00:02:13,479
The problem you've got with
"Day of the Daleks" and new effects

32
00:02:13,567 --> 00:02:15,683
was always going to be
the three-Dalek army.

33
00:02:15,807 --> 00:02:18,605
There are two ways of doing it,
you either do CGI,

34
00:02:18,687 --> 00:02:21,076
which on the kind of budget
we were likely to be talking about

35
00:02:21,167 --> 00:02:22,680
was not going to be very impressive,

36
00:02:22,767 --> 00:02:24,997
or you go for real, live-action Daleks.

37
00:02:25,087 --> 00:02:26,964
Now, the fact that I discovered

38
00:02:27,047 --> 00:02:31,006
that John Kelly had bought himself
an Arriflex 16mm film camera

39
00:02:31,087 --> 00:02:32,725
certainly helped me make my mind up.

40
00:02:32,807 --> 00:02:35,082
The thought that maybe
we could actually match

41
00:02:35,167 --> 00:02:39,285
the original footage from 1971,
that was the thing.

42
00:02:39,367 --> 00:02:41,278
That was what got me excited about
the whole project, really.

43
00:02:46,727 --> 00:02:49,321
<i>Having secured a location</i>
<i>and a film cameraman,</i>

44
00:02:49,407 --> 00:02:52,797
<i>all I needed now were</i>
<i>Daleks and Ogrons.</i>

45
00:02:52,887 --> 00:02:55,082
<i>I contacted an old friend,</i>
<i>Toby Chamberlain,</i>

46
00:02:55,207 --> 00:02:56,879
<i>an expert Dalek builder,</i>

47
00:02:56,967 --> 00:03:01,119
<i>and who I recall back in the 1980s</i>
<i>had made a superb Ogron costume.</i>

48
00:03:01,247 --> 00:03:04,956
<i>So, I got in touch and asked him</i>
<i>whether he wanted to be involved.</i>

49
00:03:05,847 --> 00:03:07,644
TOBY CHAMBERLAIN:
<i>I build Daleks for a living.</i>

50
00:03:07,727 --> 00:03:11,003
<i>And it's an unfulfilled ambition of mine</i>
<i>to have a Dalek on</i> Doctor Who.

51
00:03:11,087 --> 00:03:13,237
I've supplied Cybermen for <i>Doctor Who</i>

52
00:03:13,327 --> 00:03:16,683
and "Silver Nemesis" and also
in the more recent series,

53
00:03:16,767 --> 00:03:19,327
but as yet I have to build Daleks
for the real series.

54
00:03:19,407 --> 00:03:20,726
So, this is the closest I've been,

55
00:03:20,847 --> 00:03:22,121
and it's been a real fun day,

56
00:03:22,207 --> 00:03:25,199
both building it and supplying it,
and being inside it.

57
00:03:31,007 --> 00:03:33,885
It's an opportunity
I didn't really want to pass up on,

58
00:03:33,967 --> 00:03:36,481
so I suffered for my art today,
although it was a bit too hot,

59
00:03:36,567 --> 00:03:38,717
but it was good fun.
I think we all enjoyed ourselves.

60
00:03:39,087 --> 00:03:40,486
(INAUDIBLE)

61
00:03:44,087 --> 00:03:46,999
KEVAN LOOSELEY: <i>We're filming some</i>
<i>more footage for "Day of the Daleks".</i>

62
00:03:47,087 --> 00:03:49,476
I've been playing the part
of a UNIT soldier,

63
00:03:49,567 --> 00:03:52,240
so I've been running around getting
exterminated and zapped all day long.

64
00:03:56,247 --> 00:03:59,159
Great fun. Reliving me childhood.

65
00:04:08,207 --> 00:04:11,279
Well, I'm an Ogron.
I know I don't look like it now,

66
00:04:11,367 --> 00:04:12,436
but I'm an Ogron.

67
00:04:12,527 --> 00:04:15,837
(LAUGHS) I'm glad to be out
of the skin now, by the way.

68
00:04:15,927 --> 00:04:18,122
It's very, very hot in there.

69
00:04:18,567 --> 00:04:20,080
It's been a day of ups and downs,

70
00:04:20,167 --> 00:04:22,761
we've been waiting
for the weather to be bright.

71
00:04:22,847 --> 00:04:24,963
When it's bright,
I was waiting for it to go dull.

72
00:04:25,047 --> 00:04:27,641
When it was dull, I was waiting
for it to go sunny again.

73
00:04:27,727 --> 00:04:30,195
So, um, you know, it's been a
very, very good day, actually.

74
00:04:30,287 --> 00:04:32,198
We've all had a good time
here today as well.

75
00:04:34,167 --> 00:04:37,284
(SPEAKING INDISTINCTLY)

76
00:04:37,367 --> 00:04:39,562
This is the Arriflex BL,

77
00:04:39,647 --> 00:04:43,845
which is a camera that has
been about for donkey's years.

78
00:04:43,927 --> 00:04:47,203
I think it was introduced
in the mid-'60s by Arriflex.

79
00:04:47,287 --> 00:04:50,006
Um, it's a 16mm camera

80
00:04:50,087 --> 00:04:52,521
which could have sound if we so decided,

81
00:04:52,607 --> 00:04:54,643
but not today, it doesn't.

82
00:04:55,527 --> 00:04:57,757
-Okay, ready?
<i>-Ready.</i>

83
00:04:57,847 --> 00:04:59,963
And action!

84
00:05:00,047 --> 00:05:03,881
<i>Enter the building</i>
<i>and exterminate all humans.</i>

85
00:05:03,967 --> 00:05:07,277
KELLY: <i>And it is probably</i>
<i>an old BBC camera.</i>

86
00:05:07,367 --> 00:05:11,758
The Arriflex BL was the biggest
work horse of the BBC's film department

87
00:05:11,847 --> 00:05:16,443
between the mid-'60s and the early '80s.

88
00:05:16,527 --> 00:05:19,963
And, um, it's almost certainly what
they would have been using

89
00:05:20,047 --> 00:05:21,719
to shoot "Day of the Daleks".

90
00:05:27,207 --> 00:05:31,359
It's been a very hard day,
and with film being what it is,

91
00:05:31,447 --> 00:05:33,642
you don't quite know how
it's going to turn out,

92
00:05:33,767 --> 00:05:36,600
but I'm very hopeful that
it's going to look good. And, um...

93
00:05:36,687 --> 00:05:40,680
And with a bit of careful grading,
it will hopefully fit in

94
00:05:40,767 --> 00:05:43,201
to the surrounding material
nice and happily.

95
00:05:43,287 --> 00:05:45,437
BROSTER: <i>Well,John had</i>
<i>no reason to fear.</i>

96
00:05:45,527 --> 00:05:49,156
<i>The film was sent off for processing</i>
<i>and returned looking immaculate.</i>

97
00:05:49,247 --> 00:05:51,522
<i>Steve Roberts of BBC TVCentre</i>

98
00:05:51,607 --> 00:05:54,167
<i>oversaw the film's conversion</i>
<i>to a digital format</i>

99
00:05:54,247 --> 00:05:56,203
<i>using the Spirit Telecine machine.</i>

100
00:05:56,967 --> 00:05:59,481
<i>Of course, the techniques</i>
<i>for transferring film</i>

101
00:05:59,567 --> 00:06:02,365
<i>are so much better than they were</i>
<i>back in the '70s.</i>

102
00:06:02,447 --> 00:06:04,119
<i>The film sequences</i>
<i>in "Day of the Daleks"</i>

103
00:06:04,207 --> 00:06:06,801
<i>look grainy and washed out</i>
<i>compared to the new material.</i>

104
00:06:06,887 --> 00:06:09,242
<i>BBC colourist Jonathan Wood</i>

105
00:06:09,327 --> 00:06:11,636
<i>graded the film to match</i>
<i>the original colour palette</i>

106
00:06:11,727 --> 00:06:14,287
<i>and then Peter Crocker over at SVS</i>

107
00:06:14,367 --> 00:06:16,437
<i>had to effectively degrade the new film,</i>

108
00:06:16,567 --> 00:06:20,162
<i>the opposite of his usual job</i>
<i>of film and TVrestoration.</i>

109
00:06:20,247 --> 00:06:23,000
<i>The next job was to add the new effects.</i>

110
00:06:24,327 --> 00:06:27,842
I was very keen that the new effects
wouldn't look too anachronistic.

111
00:06:27,927 --> 00:06:32,478
The danger is with doing new
sort of digital effects on old TV,

112
00:06:32,567 --> 00:06:34,080
it just stands out too much, you know.

113
00:06:34,167 --> 00:06:36,237
It just looks too obviously modern.

114
00:06:36,447 --> 00:06:37,880
<i>When we started doing this,</i>

115
00:06:37,967 --> 00:06:40,037
<i>and I decided that</i>
<i>Michael Dinsdale of Farmergeddon</i>

116
00:06:40,127 --> 00:06:43,085
<i>would be the ideal candidate</i>
<i>for doing the actual digital effects,</i>

117
00:06:43,167 --> 00:06:46,079
<i>the opticals, the ray guns,</i>
<i>all that sort of stuff.</i>

118
00:06:46,167 --> 00:06:48,203
<i>My brief to him was that</i>
<i>we try and keep it</i>

119
00:06:48,287 --> 00:06:50,596
<i>looking like it could be made in 1971.</i>

120
00:06:50,727 --> 00:06:53,036
To be honest, some of the effects
that we've actually put in there

121
00:06:53,127 --> 00:06:55,687
probably do look too good for the era.

122
00:06:55,767 --> 00:06:57,405
I don't think even
a <i>Silent Running</i> budget

123
00:06:57,487 --> 00:06:59,796
could have achieved
some of those effects.

124
00:06:59,887 --> 00:07:03,926
So, you know, we have achieved
good things on a very small budget,

125
00:07:04,007 --> 00:07:07,602
largely to do with the fact that
Michael was just so talented

126
00:07:07,687 --> 00:07:11,362
and so clever with his modelling
and his CG and everything.

127
00:07:11,447 --> 00:07:13,642
It looks really...
I think it looks really impressive.

128
00:07:15,167 --> 00:07:17,123
(RAY GUNS FIRING)

129
00:07:22,847 --> 00:07:25,202
BROSTER: <i>Apart from</i>
<i>Michael Dinsdale's effects,</i>

130
00:07:25,287 --> 00:07:27,847
<i>Aaron Climas has made an</i>
<i>important contribution.</i>

131
00:07:27,927 --> 00:07:30,805
<i>A couple of shots needed</i>
<i>an experienced rotoscoper</i>

132
00:07:30,887 --> 00:07:33,276
<i>to match new effects with old shots.</i>

133
00:07:33,887 --> 00:07:36,685
<i>Particularly, we see here</i>
<i>Aaron has done a fine job</i>

134
00:07:36,767 --> 00:07:38,803
<i>of matching the movement</i>
<i>of the new screen.</i>

135
00:07:38,887 --> 00:07:42,163
<i>Plus the CSO fixes on the Dalek</i>
<i>are done by him, too.</i>

136
00:07:42,247 --> 00:07:44,761
<i>I shall lead the expedition!</i>

137
00:07:44,847 --> 00:07:47,725
<i>This time, there must be no mistake.</i>

138
00:07:47,807 --> 00:07:51,766
<i>The enemies of the Daleks</i>
<i>will be destroyed!</i>

139
00:07:51,847 --> 00:07:54,407
The idea of replacing the Dalek voices
was an interesting one.

140
00:07:54,487 --> 00:07:57,081
The originals are not particularly good.

141
00:07:57,167 --> 00:07:59,362
I don't think Paul Bernard,
the director,

142
00:07:59,447 --> 00:08:01,244
really knew what a Dalek sounded like.

143
00:08:01,327 --> 00:08:04,558
<i>The appearance of the Doctor</i>
<i>has changed before.</i>

144
00:08:04,647 --> 00:08:08,606
I remember at the time, as a kid
because I did, funnily enough,

145
00:08:08,687 --> 00:08:10,962
since I've ended up doing the
Dalek voices for <i>Doctor Who,</i>

146
00:08:11,527 --> 00:08:13,995
I did have a preoccupation
with the voices.

147
00:08:14,087 --> 00:08:15,884
They always scared me.

148
00:08:15,967 --> 00:08:19,482
And I remember thinking when I first
heard them in "Day of the Daleks",

149
00:08:19,567 --> 00:08:22,320
"This is not right!"

150
00:08:22,447 --> 00:08:24,642
You know, and of course,
since then, you know,

151
00:08:24,727 --> 00:08:26,160
since meeting other <i>Doctor Who</i> fans,

152
00:08:26,247 --> 00:08:29,159
everyone goes, "Oh, the Dalek voices
in 'Day of the Daleks' were terrible."

153
00:08:29,247 --> 00:08:30,760
And they mostly are.

154
00:08:30,847 --> 00:08:32,724
Which is an awful thing to say,

155
00:08:32,807 --> 00:08:35,446
I feel sorry for those two actors
who did them.

156
00:08:35,527 --> 00:08:38,837
<i>There has been a drop</i>
<i>in recent production figures.</i>

157
00:08:38,927 --> 00:08:42,283
-That can be explained.
<i>-Explanations are irrelevant.</i>

158
00:08:42,367 --> 00:08:44,927
(OLD AND NEW VOICES BLENDING)
<i>Production targets...must be maintained.</i>

159
00:08:45,007 --> 00:08:47,396
We will reach the targets
on the next work period.

160
00:08:47,527 --> 00:08:52,999
<i>For the next work period, target figures</i>
<i>will be increased by 10%.</i>

161
00:08:53,087 --> 00:08:55,760
So, there was a suggestion
that we try to replace them.

162
00:08:55,847 --> 00:09:00,921
The problem with this story is that
all we have is the final mono mix.

163
00:09:01,007 --> 00:09:02,725
We don't have the dialogue separately,

164
00:09:02,807 --> 00:09:05,241
we don't have the Dalek voices,
the original Dalek voices separately.

165
00:09:05,327 --> 00:09:07,443
We don't have the music separately.

166
00:09:07,527 --> 00:09:09,836
So, if you're going to put
new Daleks on,

167
00:09:09,927 --> 00:09:12,441
you've got to take the old Daleks off.

168
00:09:12,527 --> 00:09:14,677
Of course, when you take
the old Daleks off,

169
00:09:14,767 --> 00:09:17,440
any music that's under them,
sound effects that's under them,

170
00:09:17,567 --> 00:09:20,957
other people talking that's under them,
that all comes off as well.

171
00:09:21,047 --> 00:09:23,277
So, the first job was a tricky one,

172
00:09:23,367 --> 00:09:26,677
lifting bits of sound and even
tape noise from elsewhere in the story,

173
00:09:26,767 --> 00:09:28,564
so that I could take the Daleks out,

174
00:09:28,647 --> 00:09:30,842
so that it would sound as if
they'd never been there,

175
00:09:30,927 --> 00:09:34,283
and we were left with just
a clean track, it was very tricky.

176
00:09:34,367 --> 00:09:36,358
But eventually, apart from
a couple of points

177
00:09:36,447 --> 00:09:38,722
where they trod on other people's lines,

178
00:09:38,847 --> 00:09:41,884
they did come out pretty clean.
I was very pleased with it.

179
00:09:45,367 --> 00:09:47,961
DALEK: <i>What is your report?</i>

180
00:09:48,047 --> 00:09:50,845
<i>We have a fix</i>
<i>on the time transfer device.</i>

181
00:09:51,007 --> 00:09:54,317
<i>It is operating again</i>
<i>in the 20th century time zone.</i>

182
00:09:54,727 --> 00:09:56,319
<i>And it must be them.</i>

183
00:09:56,407 --> 00:10:00,844
(VOICES BLENDING) <i>You have obtained</i>
<i>the space-time coordinates?</i>

184
00:10:02,047 --> 00:10:05,278
CONTROLLER: <i>We're trying now.</i>
<i>The trace is much stronger this time.</i>

185
00:10:05,367 --> 00:10:08,279
<i>-There is...</i>
-You must not fail!

186
00:10:09,007 --> 00:10:12,443
AYRES: <i>I've known Nick Briggs for years.</i>
<i>We go back a very long way.</i>

187
00:10:12,527 --> 00:10:15,564
We first met working on
Keith Barnfather's <i>Myth Makers</i> series,

188
00:10:15,647 --> 00:10:17,444
where I was doing the sound
on all of the early ones

189
00:10:17,527 --> 00:10:18,755
and wrote the music for it.

190
00:10:18,847 --> 00:10:21,042
And Nick was the interviewer.

191
00:10:21,127 --> 00:10:23,641
And of course, we were all
great <i>Doctor Who</i> fans,

192
00:10:23,727 --> 00:10:25,001
which was why we were doing that.

193
00:10:25,087 --> 00:10:28,875
Nick was not just a <i>Doctor Who</i> fan,
he was a complete Dalek nut.

194
00:10:29,807 --> 00:10:32,924
And he still is. And of course,
he is now voice of the Daleks

195
00:10:33,007 --> 00:10:35,840
on the new series and quite rightly so,
because he loves it

196
00:10:35,927 --> 00:10:37,155
and he's very good at it.

197
00:10:37,247 --> 00:10:39,044
So, of course,
if we were going to do this,

198
00:10:39,127 --> 00:10:41,800
we'd get him in
to do the Dalek voices on this.

199
00:10:42,527 --> 00:10:45,758
What I wanted and I think
what Steve Broster,

200
00:10:45,847 --> 00:10:49,635
the producer of this, wanted
was very classic-sounding Daleks.

201
00:10:49,727 --> 00:10:52,036
We didn't want new-series Daleks

202
00:10:52,127 --> 00:10:54,243
to have suddenly appeared
in a classic <i>Doctor Who</i> episode.

203
00:10:54,327 --> 00:10:55,965
<i>Exterminate them!</i>

204
00:10:56,167 --> 00:10:59,318
The way we solved that was to ask Nick

205
00:10:59,407 --> 00:11:01,682
to pitch it down slightly.

206
00:11:01,767 --> 00:11:03,723
To be not quite as,

207
00:11:04,047 --> 00:11:07,801
as quite deranged
as the new Daleks can be.

208
00:11:08,007 --> 00:11:11,158
Um, so pitch it down slightly,
a bit more measured in his delivery.

209
00:11:11,247 --> 00:11:13,442
But one of the main things I've done is

210
00:11:13,527 --> 00:11:15,802
rather than using
a new digital ring modulator,

211
00:11:15,887 --> 00:11:17,161
which is what Nick does now,

212
00:11:17,247 --> 00:11:19,886
I've used a classic
analogue ring modulator,

213
00:11:19,967 --> 00:11:22,197
one that was made actually
in the early '80s,

214
00:11:22,287 --> 00:11:24,323
which was the kind of thing being used

215
00:11:24,407 --> 00:11:26,159
to create the Dalek voices
during the 1980s

216
00:11:26,247 --> 00:11:29,319
and is very close to the kind of thing
they were using right back,

217
00:11:29,407 --> 00:11:31,079
back in the '60s.

218
00:11:31,167 --> 00:11:34,682
But I've also used a bit of
distortion on the voice,

219
00:11:34,767 --> 00:11:37,565
which gives it a real edge to it.

220
00:11:37,647 --> 00:11:41,799
All enemies of the Daleks
must be destroyed!

221
00:11:41,927 --> 00:11:46,443
Exterminate them! Exterminate them!

222
00:11:46,527 --> 00:11:50,406
Exterminate them! Exterminate them!

223
00:11:50,487 --> 00:11:54,844
(MIXING WITH DISTORTED VERSION)
<i>Exterminate them! Exterminate them!</i>

224
00:11:55,647 --> 00:11:59,435
So, I think it sounds...
It's obviously Nick doing the Daleks,

225
00:11:59,527 --> 00:12:01,438
it sounds modern,
it sounds a bit up-to-date.

226
00:12:01,527 --> 00:12:05,122
But it also has that sort of classic
analogue sound to it.

227
00:12:05,207 --> 00:12:07,277
It's a little bit less
predictable, I think,

228
00:12:07,367 --> 00:12:09,119
than a contemporary digital effect.

229
00:12:09,207 --> 00:12:12,119
Um, and I'm quite pleased
with the way it sounds.

230
00:12:12,207 --> 00:12:17,486
<i>The visitors will be re-captured</i>
<i>and returned here for mind analysis.</i>

231
00:12:17,567 --> 00:12:19,637
Mark Ayres' contribution's
enormous, you know.

232
00:12:19,767 --> 00:12:21,405
His work's just terrific, you know.

233
00:12:21,487 --> 00:12:24,684
And obviously he's very sympathetic
to the original materials,

234
00:12:24,767 --> 00:12:26,280
and the new sounds he's created,

235
00:12:26,367 --> 00:12:28,676
the new atmospheres on the future Earth,
that sort of thing,

236
00:12:28,767 --> 00:12:30,564
are absolutely just top-notch,
brilliant,

237
00:12:30,647 --> 00:12:32,922
really brings the thing to life.

238
00:12:37,767 --> 00:12:39,997
There are lots of little changes...

239
00:12:40,127 --> 00:12:42,197
Some changes
the purists will probably hate,

240
00:12:42,287 --> 00:12:44,005
but I gave myself carte-blanche

241
00:12:44,087 --> 00:12:46,726
to basically change anything
I felt needed changing.

242
00:12:46,807 --> 00:12:48,763
You know, the original's
still on the DVD.

243
00:12:48,847 --> 00:12:51,725
You can still watch "Day of the Daleks"
as it was transmitted in 1 972.

244
00:12:51,807 --> 00:12:55,880
But our version, you know,
I've taken away any little actor fluffs,

245
00:12:55,967 --> 00:12:58,162
a few little camera movements
that were slightly off,

246
00:12:58,247 --> 00:13:02,160
I've tried to basically just
nip and tuck where possible

247
00:13:02,247 --> 00:13:04,556
and just make the thing
just that little bit more polished.

248
00:13:04,647 --> 00:13:05,841
That's the idea.

249
00:13:05,927 --> 00:13:08,395
Whether we've achieved it,
well, I'll let you judge.


