Let me show in a parable
to what extent our nature is enlightened
or unenlightened.
Envision human figures living in an underground cave,
with a long entrance across the whole width of the cave.
Here they have been from their childhood,
and have their legs and necks chained
so that they cannot move,
and can only see before them,
being prevented by the chains from turning their heads around.
Above and behind them
a fire is blazing at a distance.
They see only their own shadows
which the fire throws on the opposite wall of the cave
For how could they see anything but the shadows
if they were never allowed to move their heads?
Between the fire and the prisoners
there is a raised way
in a low wall built along the way like a screen
which puppet players have in front of them
over which they show the puppets.
Do you see men passing along the wall
carrying all sorts of articles
which they hold projected above the wall?
Statues of men and animals made of wood and stone and various materials?
of the objects which are being carried in like manner
they would only see the shadows?
And if they were able to converse with one another,
would they not suppose that they were naming
what was actually before them?
And suppose further that there was an echo
which came from the wall,
would they not be sure to think,
when one of the passers-by spoke
that the voice which came from the passing shadow?
To them, the truth would be literally nothing
but the shadows of the images.
And now look again, and see what will naturally follow
if one of the prisoners is released.
At first, when he is liberated and compelled suddenly to stand up
and turn his head round and look towards the light,
All this will hurt him, and he would be much too dazzled to see distinctly
those things whose shadows he had seen before.
Then conceive some one saying to him,
that what he saw before was an illusion.
But that now, when he is approaching nearer to reality
and his eye is turned towards more real existence,
he has a clearer vision.
What will be his reply?
And you may further imagine that his instructor is pointing
to the objects as they pass and requiring him to name them,
will he not be perplexed?
Will he not think that the shadows which he formerly saw
are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?
And suppose once more, that he is reluctantly dragged up a steep and rugged ascent
and held fast until he is forced into the presence of the sun himself.
When he approaches the light his eyes will be dazzled,
and he will not be able to see anything at all of what are now called realities?
He will require to grow accustomed to the sight of the upper world.
But first he would see the shadows best,
next the reflections of objects in the water,
and then the objects themselves.
Then he will gaze upon the stars and the spangled heaven
and the light of the moon.
He will see the sky and the stars by night
Last of all he will be able to see the sun,
and not mere reflections of it in the water,
but he will see the sun in its own proper place,
and not in another.
And he will contemplate the sun as it is.
Will he then not proceed to argue that this is the sun
who gives the season and the years,
and is the guardian of all that is in the visible world,
and in a certain way the cause of all things
which his fellows have been accustomed to behold?
Truly he will first see the sun, then reason about it.
And when he remembered his old habitation,
and what was the wisdom of the cave and his fellow-prisoners,
do you not suppose that he would bless himself for the change, and pity them?
And if they were in the habit of conferring honors among themselves on those
who were quickest to observe the passing shadows
and to remark which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were together;
and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to the future,
do you think that he would care for such honors and glories,
or envy the possessors of them?
Would he not say with Homer,
"Better to be the poor servant of a poor master, and to endure anything,
rather than think as they do and live after their manner"?
Imagine once more, such a one coming suddenly out of the sun
to be replaced in his old situation;
would he not be certain to have his eyes full of darkness?
And if there were a contest of measuring the shadows,
and he had to compete with the prisoners who had never moved out of the den,
while his sight was still weak,
and before his eyes had become steady
wouldn't they all laught at him
and say he spoiled his eyesight by going up there
and that it was better not even to think of ascending;
and if any one tried to release another and lead him up to the light,
let them only catch the offender,
and they would put him to death.
It is the task of the enlightened
not only to ascend to learning and to see the good
but to be willing to descend again to those prisoners
and to share their troubles and their honors,
whether they are worth having or not.
And this they must do,
even with the prospect of death.
They shall give of their help to one another
wherever each class is able to help the community.
What do you think of this parable?
What's an example today of seeing the "wrong" reality?