欢迎大家收看我的演讲 Welcome to my presentation.
大家好，我是塞尔吉奥，也有人叫我唐·科里昂 I'm Sergio, also known as Don Corleone.
今天我们来聊聊 And today we're going to talk about
小盲位时的盲注对盲注的单一灰色地带问题 blind versus blind single gray spot as a small blind.
在此前的演讲中 The previous presentation that I did,
我们聊了聊关于大盲位的一些内容 we talked about the big blind side of things.
如果你还记得之前的内容 So if you forge that,
你就能掌握这次演讲的核心动态 then you'll get the dynamic
我们还是会以类似的方式来展开讨论 of how we're going to treat this presentation as well.
整体结构会非常相似 It's going to be fairly similar in structure.
如果你还没有看过另一个的话 And if you haven't watched the other one,
我确实建议你这样做 I do recommend that you do.
我认为这很不错，所以今天我们将学习一些关于你的事情 I think it's a pretty good one, so today we're going to learn about things that you
可能会因此导致你的胜率下降，因为你站位不佳。正如我之前多次提到的 probably do that kill your win rate out of position. As I said multiple times before,
我觉得作为初学者、新手玩家或者整体实力较弱的玩家，通常都会存在差距 I feel like as a beginner player, a newer player, or just a weaker player overall, usually the gap
你的技能在非优势位置和优势位置之间的差距会是最大的，而较强的玩家则会表现得更好 between your skill out of position and in position is going to be the widest, whereas stronger players
倾向于在两种情况下都趋向于表现得相当不错。你倾向于学习 tend to converge to being pretty good in both scenarios. You tend to learn
在打好位置上的比赛之前，要先在位置上打好比赛，因此人们有很多 to play well in position before you start playing well out of position, so people have a lot of
这里有问题，他们确实犯了很多错误，降低了他们的胜率 trouble here and they are definitely making a lot of mistakes that reduce their win rate.
我们将学习大盲位可能会犯哪些类型的错误 We're going to learn about what kinds of mistakes we can expect from the big blind.
我们会讨论来自不同类型玩家的玩法，当然也会讲到如何再次针对他们的弱点 From different types of players and we will talk about, of course, how to attack those again if you
如果你看过之前的演讲，你会对其中的动态有所了解 watch the previous presentation, you will kind of understand the dynamic. At the end of the day,
其实剥削漏洞的方法始终如一，只是变量有所不同 exploiting leaks is the same all the time, really, just under different variables.
我们还会讨论如何在没有任何信息的情况下，制定一个从根本上稳固的策略 And we'll also talk about how to have a fundamentally solid strategy whenever we don't
并且我们希望以一种不容易显露牌面、不容易被对手读牌的方式进行游戏 have any reads and we just want to play in a way that is not face-up, easily readable.
总的来说，我们会努力让自己的游戏表现更好，暂时没有更好的表达方式 And overall, we're going to try to play well, for lack of a better word.
为什么这点如此重要？ Why does this matter?
庄位对盲注是扑克中最常见的情况之一，但人们却常常忽视它，对吧？ Well, the button versus blind is one of the common situations in poker that people still neglect, right?
我已经说过这句话一百万次了，对吧？ I've said this a million times, right?
庄位对大盲注的情况非常常见，但人们往往研究它。庄位对盲注的情况也非常频繁，也许吧 Bottom versus big blind happens a lot, but people study it. Button versus blind happens a lot, maybe.
研究较少，所以在这方面可能还有很大的提升空间 Not as much, but then people don't study it as much, so there's probably more room for improvement.
你可以在不利位置时利用对手的错误来获取优势 Room for you taking advantage of your opponent's mistakes, etc., playing out of position.
在这方面犯错的可能性最大，因此改进的机会也最多 Has the biggest room for mistakes and therefore for improvement.
可以看作是我刚刚提到的内容的补充 Kind of piggybacking off what I just said.
几分钟前提到的 A couple of minutes ago.
如果你在扑克中感到棘手 If you're having trouble with something in poker,
那很可能是因为不利位置 it's probably out of position.
宽范围的牌局中有很多机会 With wide ranges, there are a lot of opportunities
找到漏洞并采取剥削策略 to come across leaks and apply exploits,
无论是你还是你的对手都可以做到 both for you and your opponent.
如果你的对手弃牌过多 If, for example, your opponent is overfolding,
那么你就有许多机会用手牌过度诈唬，对吧？ then you have a lot of hands with which to overbluff, right?
范围太宽广时，你可能更容易犯错 There's also opportunities for you to make mistakes with such wide ranges.
你的范围里有不少空气牌和牌力极低的牌 A lot of air in your range, a lot of absolute low hand strength.
要做出正确的跟注、防守，并保持足够的粘性会非常困难 It can be hard to make the correct call downs, the correct defense, to be sticky enough.
所以这确实让局面更难处理 So definitely makes things tougher.
接下来我们聊聊翻牌圈的持续下注 So let's talk about flop c-bet.
以及我常见的一些错误，这些错误你可能也会犯 And some of the things that I see a lot in terms of mistakes that you're probably making
或者至少是一些潜在的问题 or at least potential things
这些都是你在自己的牌局中应该注意的地方 that you should consider in your own game
因为这些情况非常普遍 Because these are very common.
所以记得不要完全以权益为导向来打牌，明白了吗？ So make sure to not play completely equity-driven, okay?
所谓权益驱动打牌，基本上指的是 Playing equity-driven basically means
用强牌下注 to bet with good hands,
用有权益的牌进行诈唬下注 bet with equity in terms of bluffs,
然后边缘牌和差牌选择过牌，是吧？ and then check with middling hands and bad hands, right?
这就叫权益驱动策略 That would be an equity-driven strategy.
如果你这么打，效果会很差 And if you do that, it's just not going to be good.
因为这样会让你的过牌范围被封顶 Because what happens is that it will cap your checking range,
而这对不利位置来说是非常非常糟糕的，对吧？ which out of position is very, very bad, right?
翻牌圈有三条街 There's three streets on the flop.
有三条街道可能会遇到侵害 There's three streets in which you can face aggression
当你处于不利位置并选择过牌 when you're out of position and you check.
所以你绝对不想随意限制你的过牌范围 So you definitely don't want to willy-nilly cap your checking range
除非有非常充分的理由 unless there's a very good reason for it.
我们将讨论一些你可能会考虑的原因 We'll talk about some reasons why you would want to potentially
限制您的检查范围 cap your checking range.
如果你完全以权益驱动的方式进行游戏，它会迫使你在某些线路上过度弃牌 It will force you to overfold on some lines if you play completely equity-driven.
你的过牌范围由边缘牌和差牌组成，这只会让你在那个线路上过度弃牌 Your checking range is composed of marginal and bad hands which will just make you overfold in that line.
在检查线中过度折叠有什么问题？问题在于其他人都期望你这么做 And what's the problem to overfold in a check line? It is that everyone else expects you to.
在过牌线中频繁弃牌，因为你的行为表现出弱势，然后才采取行动 Overfall in the check line because you're showing weakness and then you're acting.
表现得很弱。可以说，你的行为过于坦率。这会影响你的持续行动 Weak. So you're just being too honest, so to speak. And it will make your continuous.
你的激进行动线会显得过于强势且容易预测。因此，如果你的范围是以权益驱动为主 Aggression lines way too strong and predictable. So if you have an equity-driven range,
当转牌或河牌出现听牌或者听牌完成时，你的范围会显得极其 When turn or river brings the draws, completes the draws, then your range is going to be extremely,
极其偏向于价值范围。即使听牌没有完成，你的范围依然会显得 Extremely value-heavy. Even when it doesn't complete the draws, your range is going to be.
非常偏向坚果牌和听牌 Very nutted and draw heavy,
你的范围仍然可能显得不够弱 Just still not weak enough of a range, potentially.
如此以权益为驱动，也会导致你 And being so equity-driven also makes you.
无法正确地处理河牌，因为这种策略形态 Not play rivers correctly by having a morphology.
导致你放弃了许多机会 That leads you to give up a lot.
所以我们会试着去理解其中的差异 So we're going to try to understand the difference
从牌面来看，与其他位置的区别在于大盲范围的宽度 in texture from other positions, given the width of big blind's range.
明白了 Okay.
极其重要 Very, very important.
大盲的范围相比对抗其他位置时要宽得多 The big blind has a much wider range than when it defends versus
例如对抗劫位以及其他位置 spotting versus hijack versus et cetera.
因此，有些牌面可能看起来无害或者对你来说相对普通 And so some of the boards that might be innocuous or they might look fairly
在盲注对盲注时可能会有额外的动态因素 normal to you, fairly average, blind versus blind, there could be an extra
我们会看到一些例子，低牌如何能在某些情况下更有利于大盲 dynamic to those low cards and we'll see some examples where low cards can benefit the big
而不是在大盲对抗前位时 blind more so than if the big blind defended versus an earlier position so we're going to
看看974双色板，这是一个非常干湿分明的板子，有一件事你需要特别注意 Look at 974 two-tone, which is a very dry-wet board, and one thing that you have to be careful of.
一个非常常见的错误是下意识地仅仅为了保护而进行防守，基本上让你的 A very common mistake is the knee-jerk reaction to play for protection only, basically having your
戴上眼罩，专注于你想要获得保护的事实，但却错过了 blinders on, tunnel visioning on the fact that you want to get protection, and you miss
所有其他变量，比如你的对手是否激进、被动，是否... all of the other variables, like whether your opponent's aggressive, passive, whether
你的检查范围是否应该受到保护？它实际上受到保护了吗？错过了所有这些东西 your checking range should be protected or not. Is it actually protected? Missing all those things
只是想着，“我需要保护。” 这是一种非常简单的看待比赛的方式 and just thinking, 'I need protection.' Just a very simplistic way of looking at the game.
那么我们来看一下这个板子 So let's look at the board.
正如我们所看到的，尺寸往往偏大 As we can see, the sizing tends to be big.
有一些小额投注，但主要是大额投注 There's some small bets going on, but mainly big sizings.
频率相当低，对吧？ And the frequency is pretty low, right?
基本上，我们在利用高对优势来展开行动 Basically, we're leveraging the fact that we have an overpair advantage.
高对几乎主导了下注范围，并成为其核心基石 Overpairs are almost driving and being the cornerstones of the betting range.
过牌范围的核心基石是像A-K和A-Q这样的牌 And the cornerstones of the checking range would be hands like ace-king, ace-queen,
像6、5、3、2这样的牌。那么如何判断我们的范围是否过于权益驱动呢？ sixes, fives, threes, twos, those sorts of hands. So how to first notice if our range is
如果你打开解算器想测试这一点，只需查看每种牌类并试着想象你会怎么行动 too equity driven? Well, if you ever open a solver and you want to test this, just go and look at
例如，我在这里过滤了高对及以上的牌，发现它大约有60%的下注频率 each hand class and try to picture what you would have done. For example, here I'm filtering for
目前整体下注范围约为35%到40% overpair plus and I'm seeing that it's betting 60% of the time roughly. Right now the overall betting
因此，当我们有好牌时，确实比有差牌时下注更频繁，但并非总是下注，甚至很少绝对下注 range for the overall range is about 35% or 40%. So we do bet more often when we have good hands
没错，这比一半的时间稍微多一些，而所有的牌都相当混合，几乎可以说是均衡的 than when we have bad hands, but we don't always bet, not even almost always. Right, this is a bit
没错，这比一半的时间稍微多一些，而所有的牌都相当混合，几乎可以说是均衡的 higher than half of the time and all hands are fairly mixed, almost you could say in an equal.
每种手牌的分布并非完全准确，因为A牌更容易用于设置陷阱，其所需条件较少 Distribution for each hand, not exactly, because aces do trap more because it needs less.
带红心的A牌在这种情况下下注更多，因为具有更高的潜在收益 Protection aces, with a heart, actually bets more in this case because of the higher implied.
转牌圈或河牌圈的赔率。不过，确实非常重要的是要仔细检查这些手牌。如果你有 Odds on turns or rivers. But yeah, very important to actually check these hands. If you have the.
如果你本能地选择持有10而完全不考虑过牌，那么你可能存在心理上的漏洞 Knee jerk reaction to have tens and not even consider checking, then you might have a mental.
心理上的漏洞。如果你持有7或4而从未考虑过过牌加注，那么你可能 Process leak. If you have sevens or fours and you never even consider check raising, then you might.
可能存在心理上的漏洞。另一个需要关注的重要范围是用来判断 Have a mental process leak. Another very important part of the range that you want to look at to tell.
你是否可能犯错的一部分，听起来像是顶对，对吧？这通常是玩家常见的手牌 If you're making a mistake potentially or not, it sounds like top pairs, right? This is the usual hand.
本能反应通常会为了保护而下注，而如果你玩得更稳健 Where people have the knee jerk reaction to bet for protection whereas if you're playing more.
稳健且关注手牌，你应该在这种情况下保护你的过牌范围 Solid and paying attention to the hand, you should protect your checking range in this.
在特定场景中，大约一半的时间用顶对保护过牌范围。好的，这些是如果你有 Particular scenario about half of the time with top pairs. Okay, so these are if you are having.
这个下注问题在于过于关注权益，可能导致价值保护不足 This problem of betting too equity-driven in terms of betting may be too thin for value protection.
那么这些牌可能会成为你的麻烦 Then these hands might be your trouble hands.
然后另一个问题可能是 And then the other problem would be potentially,
可能对差牌下注不够 potentially not betting enough with bad hands.
如你所见，对于差牌，比如没有听牌 As you can see, with bad hands, let's say no draw,
我们有时仍然下注 we're still betting sometimes.
在我们没有任何高牌和类似情况时则不会下注 Not when we don't have any overcards and that sort of stuff.
我们会讨论为什么会这样 We will talk about why that is.
但通常在不利位置，你不想在完全没有牌时下注 But generally out of position, you don't really want to bet with absolutely nothing.
所以在这里，阈值是两张高牌，或者说两张高牌就是你需要进行诈唬时的权益阈值 So here it happens to be that the threshold is either two overcards or essentially two overcards happens to be the threshold for how much equity you need to bluff.
但一定要留意那些优质的牌，千万别完全错过过牌的机会 But definitely you want to pay attention to those good/great hands and not completely miss those checks.
还有一种牌类可能会让你感到困惑 Another hand class where you might be having trouble
就是一些真正的前端听牌 is the actual frontal draws.
比如说，听花牌或者顺子听牌 For example, flush draws, open-enders.
如你所见，这些牌会继续下注 As you can see, these hands bet again
而且频率比其他牌高 more often than other hands,
但也不是每次都会这样 but not always.
甚至可以说几乎从来不是这样，对吧？ Not even almost always, right?
这些牌应当包含在过牌范围中 These hands need to be in the checking range,
比如说，可以用来进行过牌加注 for example, to have check raises.
能够在过牌线中击中同花牌 To be able to hit flushes in check lines,
不要让你的下注范围充满强牌 To not stuff your betting range with strong hands.
因为你可别搞错 Because don't be mistaken,
翻牌圈的同花听牌绝对是一张强牌 A flush draw on the flop is a strong hand.
这里红心Q的玩家几乎可以 Queen's Seekers of Hearts here is entitled
赢得几乎整个底池的EV，对吧？ To almost the entire pot in EV, right?
因此，这些牌其实都相当强 So these are actually fairly strong hands.
如果你在构建下注范围时 And if you construct your betting range
基于翻牌圈的强牌和同花听牌，你的范围就只剩强牌了，对吧？ Range based on good hands and flush draws on the flop, then your range is only good hands, right?
所以你需要注意这一点。现在我们来聊聊一些调整的可能性 So you're going to be careful about that. Now let's talk about some potential for adjustments.
因为你既想执行稳固的策略，又不想完全受其束缚 Because you want to be able to play a solid strategy but you also don't want to be completely
也不希望过于纠结，比如说，我不能为了保护权益而下注，因为这样的话 tied to it and be obsessed about, oh, I can't bet for protection because if I bet for protection,
我的过牌范围会完全被封顶，对手可能会开始超池下注 my checking range is going to be completely capped and my opponent is going to start overbetting and
我可能无法对他进行过牌加注，这将是一场灾难。但事实并非总是如此 I'm not going to be able to check raise him and it's going to be a disaster. Well, it's not always
因此，我们需要思考对手可能犯的错误，这些错误可能会影响我们制定持续下注策略 like that. So we need to think about what our opponent could be doing wrong that could influence
我不会深入讨论什么不锁定策略之类的细节，但我会给你一些参考思路 how we want to build our c-bet strategy and I'll give you I won't go too deep into no lock-in and
比如说，假设你的对手非常被动，真的非常被动，对吧？ all that but I'll give you some a few ideas for things to think about so for example
当你的对手非常被动时，如果你有顶对，比如说，让他主动并没有多大帮助 let's say your opponent is very passive, very very passive, right? When your opponent's passive
因为用顶对过牌更多情况下是一种陷阱 if you have a top pair, for example, giving him the lead is not that helpful right because checking
因为用顶对过牌更多情况下是一种陷阱 with the top pair is more or less a trap.
你或多或少是在让你的对手占据优势 You're more or less giving your opponent the lead
这样他就会用它做点什么，对吧？ so that he does something with it, right?
如果你的对手很被动 If your opponent is passive
而他却对线索无动于衷 and he doesn't do anything with the lead,
那你应该自己拿走，对吧？ then you should just take it yourself, right?
那是一个可能的调整方案 That's one potential idea for an adjustment
针对那种类型的球员 against that type of player.
面对一个咄咄逼人的对手，情况正好相反，对吧？ Against an aggressive opponent, it's the opposite, right?
因此面对一个激进的对手 So against an aggressive opponent,
如果你让他占据主导地位，会发生的是 what's going to happen is that if you give him the lead,
他会迎难而上的，对吧？如果你让他来带头，他真的会做到 He's going to take it by the horns, right? Like if you give him the lead, he's really going to
利用它。因此，当你拥有不错的牌时，可能会有益于 take advantage of it. And so when you have hands that are pretty good, it might be beneficial to
通过过牌加注或仅仅过牌跟注等方式，用好牌施加大量压力 apply a lot of pressure by check-raising, just check-calling, etc., with good hands.
正确，而不是带头。对许多人来说，发生的情况是 Right, instead of taking the lead. And what happens for a lot of people is that
当我们开始玩扑克时，我们自然而然会从与水平较差的玩家一起玩开始。我们开始玩时 when we start playing poker, we naturally start playing with bad players. We start playing at
微额游戏，或者我们开始在软池打现场比赛。我们只与那些人对战，他们是 micro stakes, or we start playing live at soft pools. And we just play against people that are
不是很好，而且他们也往往很被动。所以我们学会了这些不良习惯来攻击 not very good, and they tend to be passive as well. So we learn these bad habits to attack
对薄价值下注和薄保护下注的消极态度，并且几乎不进行慢打 that passivity with thin value bets and thin protection bets, and to not really ever slow play
或者陷阱，只是快速游戏，玩ABC，玩简单明了。这就是我们被训练的方式 or trap, just to fast play, play ABC, play straightforward. That's what we are conditioned
在浅水池中玩耍时学习，而问题在于这种策略非常有效 to learn when we play in soft pools, and the problem is that that strategy works very well.
对被动型对手效果不错，但面对激进型对手完全没有效果，对吧？ Against passive opponents, but it doesn't work well at all against aggressive opponents, right?
如果我们面对激进型对手还这样打，他会轻易击溃我们，当我们 We play like that against an aggressive opponent, he's just going to destroy us when we
过一个弱范围，我们就会失去诱捕他和用好牌慢打的机会 check a weak range, and we're going to be missing the opportunity to trap him and to slow play with
尤其是对这种类型的对手，对吧？ good hands against that particular opponent, right?
所以你需要开放心态，别拘泥于 So you want to be open to not having
一种完全固化的看待游戏的方式 a completely set-in-stone way of looking at the game,
特别是当这种方式并非GTO，对吧？ especially when that way is not GTO, right?
如果你的打法不是GTO If you're doing something that's not GTO,
那它绝对不该成为你的首选打法 then it definitely shouldn't be your go-to,
永远都用同一种策略 always the same strategy.
我不会在接下来的几点上过多纠缠 I won't harp too much on the following point,
但我想谈谈我们过牌时会发生什么，因为这是我看到很多人犯的另一个错误。当你过牌面对一个半池下注时，人们常常会从一个学习中推断出另一个结论，对吧？ But I do want to talk about what happens when we check, because this is another mistake that I see a lot of people making, is that when you check and you face like a half-pot bet, the way humans learn a lot of the time is we learn about one thing and then we extrapolate that knowledge to another spot, right?
因此我们学习了如何在大盲对庄位时面对持续下注 So we learned about facing c-bets, block big blind versus bottom.
我们刚刚了解到，可能在9-7-4听花面时，大盲对庄位 And we just learned that maybe on a 9-7-4 two-tone, big blind versus bottom,
我们会面对一个半池的持续下注 we face a half-pot c-bet.
假设K-Q杂色是要弃牌的，对吧？ And let's say King-Queen offsuit is a fold, right?
于是到了这里，你的大脑会想让你推断出 And so you get here, and your brain wants you to extrapolate that
当你面对这样的情况时，你会想弃牌 when you face the step, and you want to fold.
我的意思是，弃牌并不是一个大错误 And, I mean, it's not a huge mistake to fold,
但在这里是混合情况，我想在庄位对大盲时，这就会是一个弃牌，对吧？ But here it's mixed, and I assume that when we go to button versus big blind, it's just going to be a fold, right?
例如，这里如果我们看KQ非同花的权益，大约是43% For example, here, if we look at the equity, King-Queen offsuit has about 43% equity.
KQ非同花，没有后门听牌，大约有43%的权益，对吧？ King-Queen, no backdoor, about 43% equity, right?
如果是大盲对庄位，权益大约是36% If we went to big blind versus button, the equity is going to be 36% equity.
因此，面对庄位时，权益显著降低，处于更低水平 So very, very significantly low equity, lower equity when facing the button.
所以当你防守时，无论是面对平注还是任何形式的下注 So that's when you're defending versus a flat bet, when you're defending versus any bet,
这与你的具体手牌无关 it doesn't matter what your cards say.
这并不是在于我是否有这张牌或那张牌 It's not about, do I have this card and this card?
我是否有A高牌？ Do I have Ace high?
这确实能帮助你做出决定 That helps you make the decision.
但关键在于手牌的权益 But what matters is the equity of the hand.
我的牌有多少权益，我应该怎么去实现这些权益？ What's my equity and how am I going to realize that equity?
所以，这取决于你对手的范围 And so depending on your opponent's range,
你的权益可能会更高或者更低 Your equity is going to be higher or lower.
所以，当你研究翻牌圈防守时 Therefore, when you try to study flop defense,
你不能仅仅关注一个位置 You can't just focus on one position.
你需要学会如何防守底范围 You need to learn to defend versus bottom range,
以及防守大盲范围，还有UTG范围 Versus big blind range, versus UTG range.
当我们面对 When we face
庄位的持续下注时 A c-bet from the bottom
我们面对的是基于一个范围的持续下注 We're facing a c-bet from a range
翻牌前的情形是这样的 That Preflop looked like this
这是他的牌范围 This is what his range
的样子，当我们遇到 looks like, when we face
在盲注对盲注时的一次刺探下注 a stab, blind vs blind
我们对手的牌范围 Our opponent's range
到翻牌圈时 as it arrives
呈现出这样的样子 at the flop, looks like this
你可以明显看出它非常非常 You can tell it's very, very
弱，因此我们的权益 much weaker, and so our equity
用我们的牌，权益会更高 with our hands is going to be just higher equity
好的，别说了，如果UTG在翻牌圈持续下注，其范围比按钮位置的范围要强得多 Okay, let alone if UTG c-bits of flop well the range is extremely stronger than from the button.
所以我们需要减少防守绝对的手牌组合，或者我们需要减少防守 So we need to defend less absolute hand strings or we need to defend less.
使用相同的绝对手弦，对吧？我们需要尝试——我们不需要知道 With the same absolute hand strings, right? We need to try to—we don't have to know the
公平性栏，你一定需要了解对手的范围越广，力量越弱 equity bar, and you definitely need to understand how the wider your opponent's range is, the weaker
你的手牌需要防守。好的，一个非常容易犯的错误是当牌面像这样的情况时 hands you need to defend. Okay, and a very easy mistake to make is when a board like the one
我们正在考虑，特别是面对小额下注时，只是一个小步骤就忘记去防守 we were looking at, especially against small bets, as a small step to just forget to defend
手牌像这样完全一致，甚至可能还有一些更强的手牌，对吧？反向小额下注那 hands like this completely and even some stronger hands potentially, right? Inverse small bets that
甚至更加夸张，KQ只是一个轻松的跟注，甚至KJ、KT也是如此 gets even more exaggerated where KQ is just an easy call, even KJ, KT
频繁拨打电话。所以是的，基本上要努力研究这些类型的防御策略 are calling a lot. So yeah, basically make an effort to study these kinds of defense based on
不同的位置。我确实建议使用GTO Wizard中的钻探模块。我认为它非常 different positions. I do recommend using the drilling module in GTO Wizard. I think it's very
这些事情的好处在于通过重复训练和创造来实现 Good for these things. I think these things are best trained with repetition and just creating.
那些，就是训练直觉。所以Carol问，你认为 Those, you know, just training that intuition. So Carol asked, do you think it would be a reasonable
在不利位置rage check低中牌面是否合理，因为大盲在数据上通常过于关注权益 strategy to rage check out of position a low mid flops due to big line in general being too equity
并且有一个较弱的过牌范围。因此，我想更频繁地进入这些情况 driven on stats and having a weaker check back range. So I want to get in these situations more
如果你知道对手是这种情况，那么更多地过牌是完全合理的 often. Well, if you know that to be true from your opponent, then it can be definitely reasonable
特别是当对手权益驱动时，尤其是持有差牌和空气牌时 to check more, especially with bad hands, especially with air when your opponent is equity-driven.
你真正想要过牌的牌是差牌，你可以在翻牌圈过牌 The hands that you really, really want to check are bad hands that you can check the flop
对手下注你弃牌。所以你为他们过牌。很好，如果他过牌，你可以在未来增加极其 and he bets on your fold. So you check for them. Okay, cool. And if he checks, you add extremely
有利可图的诈唬机会，因为对手权益驱动 profitable bluffing spots in the future because of his equity-drivenness.
因此，你可以对这样的对手rain check，但从中获得的EV So you could rain check against such an opponent, but really the EV from that.
策略来自于，或者说大部分的经济价值来自于你针对那些的策略 Strategy is coming from the, or most of the EV from your strategy against those
对手通过在检查线中注入空气来攻击他的检查线 opponents comes from putting the air in the check line to attack his check line
后来，不过我会说，好的手，检查好的手 later, whereas I would say that the good hands, checking with the good hands in
那个情况更像是可选的，可以说是为了平衡，这看起来没问题 that scenario is more so optional and you could say for balance, which seems fine.
所以是的，我认为这其中有一些道理 So yeah, I think there's some truth to that.
有几种不同的漏洞和方法你可以尝试 There's a few different exploits and approaches you could
利用某人竟会如此 take to exploit someone like that.
有些人更狡猾 Some of them are more sneaky.
其中一些更难 Some of them are harder.
其中一些更加平衡一些 Some of them are more balanced-ish.
有些完全是失衡的 Some are completely imbalanced.
因此在翻牌圈进行持续下注 So c-betting the flop.
如我们所说，权益范围很容易重合，这会导致过度弃牌 As we said, it's easy to have an equity joint range, and this causes over-folding
因此在过牌后，我们需要保护自己不受此影响 after checking, so we need to protect us from that.
我们要确保过牌时有足够的好牌，同时下注时也有足够的弱牌 We need to make sure to check enough decent hands and bet enough weak hands.
另外，不要忘记坚果牌和听牌，比如听花和顺子听牌等 And don't forget about the nuts and draws, flush draws and straight draws and whatnot
也需要过牌以确保有足够的过牌加注，因为如果我们 need to check in order to have enough check raises as well, because if we
如果我们过牌跟注够多，但没有足够的过牌加注，对手依然能通过下注来击败我们 check call enough, but we don't check raise enough, then our opponent can still destroy us
如果我们没有足够的过牌加注，但过牌跟注够多，对手可以高额下注以获取价值，而不必担心被加注 by betting. If we don't check raise enough, but we check call enough, our opponent can just bet
对手可以为了争取权益而下注 extremely high for value without worrying about getting raised. Our opponent can bet for equity
实现权益很简单，你可以直接下注平注，然后在转牌圈过牌，从而轻松实现权益 Realization. You can just bet the flat and then check back return and realize equity very easily.
所以，作为基础策略，确保有一个合理的check-raise范围非常关键 So very important to at least as a baseline strategy, have a proper check raising range.
要小心从其他场景中推导出的理念，避免直接套用，对吧？ Be careful about extrapolating ideas you learn from other spots, right?
不过，推导是必要且有益的 Now, extrapolating is necessary and good.
我们确实需要进行推导 We need to extrapolate.
我们需要通过一个场景中的信息来预测下一个场景可能的情况，对吧？ We need to use information from one spot to paint a picture about what the next spot is going to be like, right?
但是你应该通过学习更多内容，尽量让这个新画面更加清晰，对吧？ But you should strive to make this new picture as high resolution as you can by learning about many different things, right?
你需要尽可能多地利用数据点进行推导 You need to be able to extrapolate from as many data points as you can.
根据对手类型，我们可能会将牌导向不同的行动路径，就像我们之前看到的那样 Depending on the opponent type we may want to funnel hands into different lines so we saw.
如果我们的对手是权益驱动型，比如Carol提到的那样，我们可以利用延迟cbet进行剥削 That if our opponent is, for example, equity-driven as Carol said, we can abuse delay cbet.
用诈唬下注，因为对手可能会封顶他们的过牌范围 Bets with bluffs because that opponent is going to cap their checking range if our opponent is.
如果对手很激进，我们可以运用圈套和慢打；如果对手很被动，我们则可以通过下注来压制 Aggressive, we can abuse trapping and slow play. If our opponent is passive, we can abuse betting.
进行薄价值下注、薄保护性下注，以及为了实现权益的下注。这取决于牌面，例如高牌A Thin for value and betting thin for protection and betting for equity realization. Depends like.
甚至是高牌A这样的牌。所以我们来做一个小测验：在5-4-4听花面中，持续下注策略应该有多高的频率 Even ace highs and such. So let's do a little quiz. 5-4-4 two-tone cbet strategy. How often.
让我查看一下内容。选择低于25%的下注或范围过牌，中等频率，比如介于40%到60%之间 Should we cbet? And let me pull up the thing. Sub 25% or range check, middling frequency.
40%到60%，或者超过75%的范围下注。你看，有很多人认为这是接近范围过牌 So let's say between 40% and 60%, and over 75% range bet. See, a lot of people are saying it's.
有些人认为是接近范围过牌，也有人认为是接近范围下注 Close to a range check. Some people are saying it's close to a range bet.
似乎大部分人倾向于范围下注策略，好吧，好吧 There seems to be mostly, okay, okay.
大家意见不统一 There's a divide.
在下注频率上出现了分歧 There's a divide right there.
这个观点非常两极分化，对吧？ It's a very polarized opinion, right?
人们几乎没有说这是一个混合频率 Not many people are saying that it's a milling frequency.
大家觉得它更倾向于极端情况 People think it's more towards the extremes.
看着我 Look at me.
好吧 All right.
那我们来看一下答案吧 So let's look at the answer.
答案是它非常接近底池范围份额 And the answer is it's pretty close to a range share.
有些人可能会觉得意外 And some people might be surprised
因为他们在按范围下注 because they were range betting it.
他们到了翻牌圈直接按范围下注 They were just getting to this flop and range betting.
你得注意了 And you need to be careful
因为大盲的牌范围 because the big blind's range
在盲位对盲位防守的情况下 when it defends blind versus blind
和大盲防守的情况完全不同 is not at all the same as when the big blind defends,
我想是庄位、CO位、劫位以及前位 I guess, button cutoff hijack UTG.
当大盲面对前位防守时 When the big blind defends against UTG,
他们基本不会有太多4x牌 they're not going to really have 4x that much.
你通常会弃掉大多数4x牌，对吧？ You're just going to fold the big blind with most 4x, right?
即使是面对CO位或庄位 Even versus the cutoff on the button,
你一般也会弃掉大量4x牌 you're going to mostly fold a bunch of 4x hands.
在盲注对战时进行防守 But when you defend blind versus blind,
你的范围中会包含很多4x you're going to have a lot of 4x.
你的范围中会有纯5-4杂色牌 You're going to have 5-4 offsuit pure,
或者你的范围几乎是纯范围 or you need almost pure.
你的范围中会包括A-4杂色牌 You're going to have ace-4 offsuit.
你的范围中会有像8-4同花、9-4同花这样的牌 You're going to have hands like 8-4 suited, 9-4 suited, hands like that.
因此，这些低点数对子牌面对小盲位置来说非常不利 So these low paired boards become really, really bad for the small blind.
我们来看一下具体情况 So let's look at that.
如你所见，这个牌面通常是约20%的下注 So as you can see, the board is around 20% bet.
最佳的简化策略可能是范围过牌，而不是范围下注 The best simplification would probably be to range check rather than range bet.
原因还是因为大盲的牌范围 And the reason, once again, is because the big blind's range
包含许多这样的牌 has a bunch of these hands.
还有很多类似的牌 And a bunch of these hands.
而当你在庄位开池时，这些牌要么没有，要么很少出现 Whereas if you open the button, none of this, not a lot of this.
这些牌是缺失的 These are missing.
因此，这确实对游戏动态产生了很大影响 So it does change the dynamic a lot.
而作为小盲位玩家，当你在小盲位开池时 Whereas your range as the small blind, as when you open the small blind,
你的范围与庄位开池的范围非常相似 is very, very similar to the range that opens the button.
因此，你的范围同样强大，但对手的范围也不弱 So your range is just as strong, but your opponent's range is strong.
因此，这些因素变化很大 And therefore, these things change a lot.
行吗？ Okay?
所以我们得当心点 So we want to be careful.
一定要格外小心这一点 Very, very careful about that.
牌面完成了 Finished the board.
像这样的牌面有很多 There are a lot of boards like this.
我们来看看下注后会发生什么 And let's look at what happens if we bet.
在这个牌面上，如果我们选择小额下注，对手通常会 So on this board, if we bet small, our opponent is supposed to
有23%的概率加注，这加注的频率相当高，而这也是 raise 23% of the time, so that's a lot of raises, and that's basically
我们不愿意频繁下注的原因之一，因为当我们 one of the reasons why we don't want to bet so much, because when we
下注后经常会被加注，因此用边缘牌下注就没有那么吸引人了 bet, we get raised a lot, so betting with marginal hands is not as enticing.
当我们选择过牌时，很容易被下注，因此就连我们的好牌 And when we check, we face a bet very often, so now even our good hands
开始有了选择慢打过牌的动机 start having an incentive for checking as a slow play.
好的 Okay.
现在我不希望你把这个视为限制你策略的条框 Now I don't want you to use this as a handcuff for your strategy.
比如说，我觉得我必须在这里进行范围过牌 Be like, I have to range check here.
比如你手里拿着一对J，然后你觉得 Like you, you get here with like a pair of Jacks and you're
我必须选择过牌，因为这个牌面对我的 like, I have to check because this range is, this board is good for my
对手的范围比较有利，诸如此类 opponent's range and yada, yada, yada.
我们回到之前讨论过的那个观点吧 Let's go back to the previous idea that we talked about before.
当我们对对手有特定的了解时，有些行为可以比单纯随机化或简化更好 So when we have a specific read on our opponent, there are things we can do better than just randomizing or simplifying.
随机化或简化其实就是说，我不太清楚什么是好还是坏，所以我选择做一些还算过得去的事情 Randomizing slash simplifying is just a way of saying, I don't really know what's good or what's bad, so I'm just going to do something that's okay.
但有时候你能判断某些事情更好还是更糟 But sometimes you can know if something is better or worse.
比如说，假设我们的对手是偏被动的 For example, let's say our opponents are passive.
假设我们的对手是偏被动的 Let's say our opponents are passive.
如果我们选择过牌 And if we check.
他们不会下这么大的注 They're not going to bet this much.
如果我们选择下注 And if we bet.
假设他们不会下这么大的加注 Let's say they're not going to raise this much.
那么 Well then.
可能是一手这样的牌 Potentially a hand like.
6-5 6-5
或者6对 or 6s
这将会变得 It would become
变得更加有利于直接下注 a lot more beneficial to just bet
因为你可以得到 because you get the benefit of
掌握主动权 taking the lead
获得牌面的保护 getting protection
立即实现价值下注 getting value right away
你无需期待对手来诈唬你 You don't have to hope your opponent bluffs you
你无需期待对手玩得足够激进 You don't have to hope your opponent plays aggro enough
你完全不用担心对手会对你进行加注 And you don't have to worry about getting raised,
也不用担心差牌全压或一些让人无语的疯狂行动线 bad shoved, or crazy lines that are going to make you
让你后悔在翻牌圈下注 regret betting the flop.
因此当面对被动的对手时 So against passive opponents,
可能仍然有必要去构建一个合理的下注范围 it might still be beneficial to build a betting range.
但是当面对激进的对手时 Against aggressive opponents, though,
确保有正确的策略显然会更加重要 it would be definitely a lot more important
并且如果可以的话 to have the proper, and if anything,
应该在这些牌面上用强牌增加慢打和设置陷阱 a surplus of slow plays and traps
拥有正确的策略显然更为关键 with good hands on these boards.
所以我会说范围检查简化 So I would say that the range check simplification
对抗优秀的对手更有优势 is better against either good opponents
甚至过于咄咄逼人的对手 or even too aggressive opponents.
好的 All right.
让我们看看其他一些板块 Let's look at some other boards
你可能犯错误的地方 where you might be making a mistake
通过从其他点推断出某种策略进行假设 by assuming a certain strategy from extrapolating from other spots.
那么我们按检查频率排序吧 So let's order by checking frequency.
而且这些类型的板子，你可能已经知道是低连接板 And these kinds of boards, you probably already knew the low-connected boards.
那些是小盲位典型的糟糕牌面 Those are the quintessential bad boards for the small blind.
所以这些当然是范围检查 And so these are, of course, a range check.
但是有些人会忘记或忽略我们之前谈论过的低配牌面 But then some people forget or miss the low-paired boards that we were talking about.
此外，这类牌面，比如这样的牌面，是一种高度单调的牌面，现在处于中间状态 Also these sorts of boards, so boards like this where it's a high monotone board now middling
低单调棋盘不是那么糟糕，但高单调棋盘更糟的原因是因为 to low monotone boards are not as bad, but the reason why the high ones are worse is because
你的同花听牌较少，大多数同花听牌包含高牌，而且大多数是大牌 you have less flushes. Most of your flush draws contain high cards, and most of the big ones
splashers 包含低牌 splashers contain low cards.
所以在一个高单色牌面上，大盲位的好牌更多 So on a high monotone board, the big blind just hits more good
比小盲注更强的牌 hands than the small blind.
然而，如果棋盘更像这样，现在就肯定是 Whereas if the board is more so like this, now it's definitely
对小盲注来说没那么糟糕 not as bad for the small blind.
所以你要小心，注意区分清楚 So you want to be careful about that, making that distinction.
当处理这类牌面时，情况会变得非常糟糕 Once you get down to these sorts of boards, it's once again very bad.
主要是因为多个变量让你处于劣势 Just because of the multiple variables giving you a disadvantage.
因此，在非常连张的牌面上，比如低连张单色牌面，你会处于不利位置 So you're out of position in a very connected board, low connected monotone, et cetera.
我会说，在单色翻牌圈中，中间单色牌面是你的范围表现较好的理想选择 So I would say in terms of monotone flops, the middle monotone boards are the sweet spot
而高单色牌面和非常低的单色牌面则表现较差 for your range being decent, whereas the high boards and very low boards
另一种牌面是——好的，这种牌面确实很有趣 are worse. Another type of board is once again the—okay, so this one is also fairly
这种牌面是A轮牌面，许多玩家在这方面经常处理错误 interesting and misplayed by a lot of players—is the ace wheel boards. Some people
有些人甚至会因为牌面有一张A，就选择范围下注，这其实不太明智 are even just going to range bet this board because it has an ace, and that's not that smart
因为大盲范围包含很多A6，也有A4杂色和A5 because the big blind has a lot of A6, the big blind has A4 offsuit, A5.
非同花的五四和三二同花，对吧？这个范围非常宽，几乎什么都涵盖了 Offsuit five-four offsuit, three-two suited, right? It's just such a wide range that everything.
这与低顺子相关，比如低连张牌面或A轮牌面都非常糟糕 That has to do with low straights, like either low connected boards or ace-wheel boards, are very, very
所以你需要谨慎。再次强调，这并不是为了限制你只能采用一种策略 bad. So you want to be careful. Now, again, this is not to handcuff you into one strategy.
也不是为了限制你的创意打法，也不是为了利用对手而这样要求 And to not play creatively and to take advantage of your opponents for the sake. It's just
这只是为了提醒你，不要随心所欲、毫无理由地打牌 for you to be aware that you can't just be playing willy-nilly in whatever way for no
在某些条件下，你可以在一个本该是范围下注或范围过牌的牌面下注 reason. You can bet on a board that's supposed to be a range bet, a range check under certain
但是这些条件不能仅仅因为你不知道该怎么办。你需要有一个合理的理由 conditions, but those conditions can't be because you don't know what else to do. You
R+说道：‘如果大盲过度弃牌5%到10%或者翻牌圈加注不足，我们还能在五四四的牌面上进行范围持续下注吗？’ need to have a proper reason. R+ says, 'Can we still range c-bet on five-four-four if big blind is
我的意思是，有两种不同的剥削策略，但我并不喜欢通过范围操作来剥削对手 over-folding by five to ten percent or just under-raising flop?' So, I mean, there's two different ways
我对这种策略并不感兴趣 of exploiting, and I'm not a fan of exploiting people by doing range things. I'm not a big fan.
玩法类似于无锁定场所，但无锁定试图以某种方式进行剥削，因为 Of play like a no-lock place but no-lock tries to play their exploits in a certain way because
如果不这样做，它可能会被反剥削，对吧？比如在服务器中，如果你试图用无锁定进行剥削 If it didn't, it would get exploited back, right? If in the server, if you try to exploit with a no
服务器永远不会，例如，只在翻牌圈下注价值牌，而只过牌空气牌，因为 Lock, the server is never going to, like for example, bet only with value on the flop and check only
因为对手会在转牌圈和河牌圈剥削这种范围形态 With air because the opponent would exploit that range morphology on the turn and the river.
我不太喜欢用这种模式来进行现实中的剥削，因为 I'm not a fan of using that type of model for real-life exploits because
如果你的对手犯了一个错误，他们可能不会真的反剥削你，尤其是在那次错误之后 If your opponent makes a mistake, they're not going to really exploit you back probably after
所以你是可以这么做的。这绝对是一个针对范围的选项 That mistake. So you can do that. That's definitely an option to range
如果你的对手很被动并且过度弃牌。但你也可以 Rate if your opponent is passive and over-folding. But you could also
尽可能以最佳方式处理每一手牌。如果你的对手在翻牌圈过度弃牌 Just play each hand in the best way possible. If your opponent is over-folding on the flop,
那么哪些牌适合下注呢？是诈唬牌，对吧？所以你可以针对这样的对手下注 Then which hands want to bet? Bluffs, right? And so what you could do against that opponent is bet.
更具体来说，可以在翻牌圈用诈唬或那些需要拒绝权益的牌采取行动，例如 More specifically with bluffs on the flop or with hands that need equity denial, for example.
如果你的对手是一个被动且过度弃牌的玩家，那么在这种情况下，你可能会采取行动 Now if your opponent is passive and over-folding, then you probably, yes, at that point you probably.
你可能会选择激进下注，因为你不想用空气牌频繁过牌，也不想用好牌过牌 Want to rage bet because you don't want to check with air that much and you don't want to check.
但如果你的对手是一个，例如一个容易弃牌的玩家 With good hands that much, but if your opponent is, for example, a folding player that's.
如果对手比较激进，你可以通过用差牌下注迫使他弃牌来加以利用 Aggressive, you might be able to take advantage of him by betting with bad hands and making.
但用好牌过牌并设下陷阱，让他疯狂行动，对吧？ Him fold, but checking with good hands and setting the trap for him to just go crazy, right? So there's.
细节很多。我想说的是，这并不像直接复制“无运气”输出的结果那么简单 A lot of details. I'm just saying that it's not as simple as copying what no luck spits out.
你必须运用自己的逻辑，同时也需要做出选择，无论如何，我的意思是你必须 You have to apply your own logic to it, and you also have to make whatever, I mean, you have.
在某种程度上接受剥削性。如果你想进行剥削，那么每次你剥削 To commit to a certain level of exploitability. If you want to exploit yourself whenever you exploit.
你就会变得容易被剥削，因此你必须做出一个选择 You're going to be exploitable, and you have to basically make a choice about.
如果你采用范围下注剥削策略或范围过牌，你的策略可能会变得容易被对手剥削 How exploitable you're going to be if you do the range bet type exploit or the range check.
剥削类型的策略是一种非常稳固的方法，对手会很难找到应对之策 Type exploit, then that's a very, very solid strategy that your opponent is going to have a
而将范围拆分为好牌和差牌来实施剥削策略，也有可能遭到对手的反制 lot of trouble countering, whereas splitting your range into good and bad hands for exploitive
这就是利弊权衡的问题，你需要在每种情况下选择你认为最优的策略 reasons has also a lot of potential to get countered. So it's just pros and cons. You have
我觉得这还要看对手的技能水平 to decide what you think is best in each situation. I think it depends on the skill level of your
那我们来聊聊持续下注之后的情况。哦，等等，Phantom问，5-4-4两色牌面上的TT是什么意思？ opponent as well. So let's talk about after c-betting. Oh wait, Phantom asks, what's the
是的，那是两色牌面。一般来说，在转牌圈不利位置时，我们会从低摊牌价值牌中按权益顺序选择诈唬牌 TT in 5-4-4 two-tone? Yeah, well, it's two-tone. After c-betting, as a general rule on the turn
让我试着用更简单的方式说。当你在转牌圈不利位置时，用权益高的牌进行诈唬，而权益较低的牌就少诈唬一点 out of position, we pick bluffs in order of equity within the low showdown value hands. Let me try to
当你在转牌圈不利位置时，用权益高的牌进行诈唬，而权益较低的牌就少诈唬一点 rephrase that in a more plain way. When you're out of position on the turn, you bluff with hands with
当你在转牌圈不利位置时，用权益高的牌进行诈唬，而权益较低的牌就少诈唬一点 a lot of equity, and then you bluff a little bit less with hands with a little bit less equity.
到现在为止，你可能已经习惯了不会用完全没有权益的牌去诈唬 Up until the point where you don't really bluff with hands with no equity right now that might
这对你来说可能看起来非常直观且合情合理 seem super intuitive and normal to you. And if it does, you're probably misplaying in position
如果是这样，那你可能在有利位置中出现了操作失误 because it's not at all how you play in position. That's not at all how you play in position.
这完全不是在有利位置时应该采用的打法 That's a specific way of playing for out of position. And the reason is because when you're
这是不利位置时的一种特定策略 out of position and you bet, you don't get enough folds compared to when you bet in position. When
原因是当你在不利位置下注时，弃牌率远低于在有利位置下注的情况 you bet in position, you get a lot of folds
而当你在有利位置下注时，你能更容易让对手弃牌 by virtue of that positional advantage,
这就是有利位置所赋予你的优势 which means that air becomes very valid to bet.
这意味着空气牌在有利位置下注是非常合理的选择 And also in position, checking back withdraws
同时，在有利位置选择过牌可以立即实现权益 realizes equity right away.
然而，如果处于不利位置，对手弃牌的概率会降低 Whereas out of position, you don't get as many folds.
因此，现在用空气牌下注可能会导致负EV So now betting with air might even be negative EV.
在转牌圈的某些情况下，选择过牌抽牌可能无法实现更多权益 In some cases on the turn, and checking withdrawals also doesn't realize as much equity.
这取决于具体的听牌类型，就像在有利位置过牌时一样，仅仅是一些不同的情况 Depending on what draw it is as if you check back in position, so it's just like a few different.
这些变量让这种打法显得很直观，尤其是当你没有深入了解时 Variables that make this way that seems very intuitive, especially when you haven't.
研究有利位置的打法后，你会发现确实有很大的不同 Looked at how in position is played, yeah it's definitely different after.
持续小额下注后，我们的范围变得融合，许多牌需要在被动行动线上进行保护 Cbetting small, our range is merged and a lot of hands need to be protected in passive lines.
好吧，这种情况在不利位置更为明显，因为你下注，比如说进行范围下注 Okay, this is more true out of position than in position because you bet, let's say you range bet.
以一个小尺度下注时，它不一定是范围下注；但可能是范围下注，你下注得非常非常全面 For a small size, it doesn't have to be a range; it could be a range bet where you bet very, very.
一个融合的范围，包括各种好牌、中等牌、边缘牌、差牌以及空气牌等等，然后继续 Mergey range with all kinds of good hands, middling hands, marginal hands, bad hands, air, etc., and then on.
转牌圈的时候，你往往就得 On the turn, you're just going to have to
用许多边缘牌选择过牌 check with a lot of the middling
对吧？因为你还能怎么办？比如说，你不能 hands, right? Because what are you going to do? Like, you can't
用这些牌下注，因为它们太弱了 bet with them, they're too weak,
而当你选择过牌时，这些牌就会显得非常 and when you check, they're just very
明显并且显得很弱，对吧？ face-up and weak, right?
又或者，它们不一定是弱牌，但却非常 Or, not necessarily weak, but they are very
容易成为对手攻击的目标 easy to attack.
所以，为了避免这种情况 And so, to avoid
处于不利位置时，你需要做的是 that, out of position, what you do is
过牌 Check,
可能选择过牌-加注，或者过牌跟注 potentially check-raise, and check-call
用非常强的手牌进行上述操作 with very strong hands,
对吧？这样可以保护那些 right? To protect those
边缘牌 middling hands.
翻牌圈进行大额持续下注后，你并不是在表明边缘牌，而是在表明你有 After cbetting big on the flop, you're not really repping middling hands; you're saying you have
一手好牌或诈唬，因此在转牌圈慢打的频率并不高 a good hand or a bluff, and so on the turn it's not as high frequency of an action
当你的范围极化时，慢打的频率较低；而当你的范围是融合时，慢打会更多。如果你从直觉上思考人们的行为，这 to slow play. When you have a polarized range, you don't slow play as much. When you have a
也很合理。例如，如果你在翻牌圈进行小额下注，然后转牌圈选择过牌，对手可能会知道或猜测 merge range, you slow play more, and if you think about it intuitively for how people think, it also
makes sense. Like if you bet small on the flop and you check the turn, your opponent knows or can
要明白，你是在代表第二对、第三对或者高牌A这样的牌，而当你在翻牌圈下大注，比如下注底池后，在转牌圈过牌时 Understand that you're repping second pair, third pair, ace highs, etc., whereas when you bet big on
比如转牌圈是一张白牌时，你选择过牌，这看起来 flop, let's say you bet pot on the flop and you check the turn on a brick, for example, it looks
像是你大多是空气牌，也许有一些选择慢打的牌，因此如果你的对手有比较强的牌 like you're gonna have mostly air and maybe a few slow plays, so if your opponent has hands worth
他可能会选择尝试诱捕你的诈唬，通过过牌来从你的诈唬中榨取价值，对吧？ something, he might choose to just try to trap your bluffs, try to get value from your
所以我觉得这种策略并不适合慢打 bluffs by checking back, right? So I guess that strategy wouldn't really make sense to slow play.
我们来看看这个牌面：K 8 3 7。转牌圈在这个牌面下注的频率意外地很低 So let's look at this board: King 8 3 7. It's a surprisingly low-frequency bet on the turn.
这里有很多诱捕和慢打的场景，同时我们需要关注诈唬的模式。我们 And there's lots of trapping and slow playing, and let's pay attention to the bluff morphology. We
翻牌圈我们选择了小尺度持续下注，然后到了转牌圈是一张白牌的时候。我们发现主要的下注尺度 c-bet the flop for small sizing, and we get to a very bricky turn. We see that our main sizing is
是相对比较大的。这并不是超池下注。最常用的下注尺度并不是超池下注。我觉得原因是 pretty big. It's not an overbet. The most common sizing is not an overbet. The reason, I think, is
因为转牌7。尤其是7并不是完全的白牌，它确实击中了某些范围 because of the seven. Specifically, the seven is not a completely complete brick. It does hit.
在有利位置时，让一些牌如两对等采取行动，而如果你 Give in position certain types of hands like two pairs and that sort of thing whereas if you
如果选择了个2，这会是个超池下注的时机。只保留7，我说过这对某些人来说 picked a two, it would be more of an overbet spot. Well, just keep the seven and I said it was
会意外地低频，因为看起来似乎你 going to be surprisingly low frequency for some of you guys because it just seems like you
小注。转牌圈平跟并没有改变局势，我的对手只是跟注，所以他的范围相对较弱 bet small. Flat the turn doesn't change anything and my opponent just called, so he's repping a
相对较弱的范围。所以我可以继续施压。然而，事情并非如此简单 relatively weak range. So surely I could just keep applying pressure. Well, that's not how it works.
当你下注后对手跟注时，他会大幅压缩他的范围，你需要在后续街上更谨慎 When you bet and your opponent calls, he's condensing his range a lot, so you need to start
谨慎应对后续街。正如我所说，我们的范围非常非常融合 being a little bit careful on falling streets. And as I said, our range is very, very, very merged.
看看所有这些需要过牌的牌。我们需要过牌如A高牌，这些需要过牌 Look at all these hands that need to check. We need to check ace highs like these need to check,
低对、第三对、第二对、底对等等。我们有很多牌型 low pairs like these, third pairs like this, second pairs, under pairs, right? We have a lot of hand
没有合理的玩法，除了过牌，对吗？ classes that there's just no way to play the hand that's reasonable other than checking, right?
面对一个厉害的对手，你可能会遇到类似的情形 Against a solid opponent, let's say, and therefore you might have found yourself in
你可能会发现自己在翻牌圈下注后拿到了一张Q this situation. You might have found yourself in a situation where you bet the flop and you have
转牌圈该怎么打呢？我不想过牌，因为我的范围已经封顶，而且对手很容易看出我有一张Q a Q, and what do I do on the turn? I don't want to check because my range is capped and it's
对手知道我有一张Q，所以他会开始下注，而我只能弃牌，这实在太糟糕了，对吧？ face-up, and I have a Q. He knows that I have a Q, so he's gonna start betting and I'm gonna
不过，当你拿到一张Q时，其实没什么好选的 have to fold, and it's gonna be a disaster, right? The thing, though, is that when you have a Q,
你只能按照大多数情况下的正确打法来打这手牌 there's not much you can do about that. You just have to play your hand the way it's supposed to
我并不是在讨论要不要针对对手进行剥削 be played most of the time. I'm not talking about whether you have exploits on your opponent, etc.
我的意思是，从基础概念来看，有些牌只能按部就班地打 I'm just saying as a baseline idea, some hands just play themselves.
你必须按照这些牌该打的方式去打 You have to play them in whatever way they have to be played.
所以当你遇到那些让人犯难的牌时，你只能先过牌，之后再做决定 And so when you have those hands that make you feel bad, you just have to check and make a decision later.
避免暴露打法的关键是不要进行让人看穿的过牌动作 The way to avoid being face-up is by not having a face-up checking.
从顶对来看，玩家约有一半时间选择过牌 If we look at top pairs, they are checking about half of the time.
超对及以上的牌型来看，玩家约有一半时间选择过牌 And if we look at over pairs plus, they are checking around half of the time.
当你持有融合型牌范围时，尤其是对手在翻牌圈选择小额下注时，你需要选择过牌 Whenever you have a mergey range, especially if they're betting small on the flop, you're gonna need to check.
许多中间牌型需要理论上的强牌保护 A lot of middling hands, and those middling hands are going to need to be protected in theory by
再次强调，如果你的对手是被动型玩家，你需要采取一种特定打法 strong hands. Once again, if your opponent is passive, you need to play a certain way. If your
对手是激进型玩家时，你需要采取另一种特定打法。而作为基础策略，这是理论上的打法 opponent is aggressive, you need to play a certain other way. But as a baseline strategy, this is
理论中的玩法。现在我们来看看诈唬的变化趋势。从图中可以看出 how it works in theory. Now let's pay attention to the bluff morphology. So, as we can see,
基本上对子以下牌型和A高牌之间很少下注，因为这些牌拥有足够的摊牌价值，下注 there's basically not a lot of bets between under pairs and ace highs because those are hands that
选择对这些牌下注通常会让较好的牌选择跟注，而较差的牌弃牌 have enough showdown value, and betting them mostly makes better call and worse fold.
因此，这些牌通常会选择过牌，但在这个特定情况下会选择下注 So these just check most of the time and it has a start in this particular case betting on a.
在不同的牌面上，比如A高牌面下注的频率可能更高，而这特别干燥且无影响的牌面 Different board, maybe ace high would be bet more often, and this particular very dry-ish, unimpactful.
牌面上没有成手牌，基本上是Q高牌，而它是较低的A高牌。较低的A高牌会略微下注 Board no made hand that's queen high really. It's low ace high. Low ace highs are betting a little.
然而，我们认为Q高牌和更低的牌是主要开始下注的牌 Bit, but let's say queen high and lower are the hands that are mostly starting to bet. We look at.
我们来看一下那个范围。如果我们看频率对权益分组 That range. If we look at the frequency pair equity bucket,
我们会很容易理解我所说的内容 We'll just very easily see what I'm talking about.
因此，当我们看到组合听牌时 So when we look at combo draw,
嗯，它通常会大多数时候下注，对吧？ Well, it's betting most of the time, right?
我们提到解算器构建 We said that the way the solver structures
不利位置的诈唬牌是非常频繁地下注 Bluffs out of position is it just bets very, very often.
在拥有较高权益时下注 With good equity.
权益较差时下注频率会降低 It bets less often with worse equity.
在权益最少的情况下 And to the point that with the least equity,
你一般不会下注，对吧？ You don't really bet, right?
因此，在组合听牌时，它的下注频率非常高 So it bets a lot with combo draws.
在听花牌的情况下，它的下注频率会非常高 It's going to bet a lot with flush draws.
几乎都是这样 Almost always.
开顺听牌时，它几乎都会下注 It's going to bet almost always with open-enders.
偶尔会有一些过牌 Some checks here and there.
频率稍微降低一些 A little bit less.
我们有一些机会 We've got shots.
然后在没有听牌的情况下 And then with no draw,
它会下注，当它有 it's betting when it has
几张比第二张牌更高的高牌 a couple overcards to the second card
并且可能有一张，比如方片牌，对吧？ and potentially the diamond, for example, right?
所以两张比第二张牌更高的牌加上一张底牌 So two overcards to the second card with a down.
然后一旦它低于那个权益类别 And then once it gets below that equity category,
它就绝对不会下注 it just never, ever bets.
红心KQ5，直接过牌 King, queen, five of heart, just a pure check.
如果我们现在交换位置 If we switched the positions right now,
如果我们在有利位置分配了这一特定范围 If we gave in position this particular range,
也就是我们现在所玩的范围 that we're playing right now,
并且在不利位置分配相反的范围 and out of position the opposite range,
这些手牌，我可以向你保证 these hands, I can assure you,
它们会相当频繁地下注，对吧？ they would bet decently often, right?
所以这就是为什么我说这可能看起来很合理 So that's why I'm saying that it might seem intuitive
去这么操作 to do it this way,
但你需要记住 but you need to remember that
这与在有利位置的情况并不完全相同 it's not the exact same as in position.
在有利位置，你会构建自己的诈唬范围 In position, you build your bluffing range.
这基本就像是全压下注 Based on almost just like betting everything
在某些情况下 Some of the time,
有时候全是空气牌 All of the air some of the time.
不利位置的范围从顶端到底端 Out of position is top to bottom.
你用范围顶端牌下注较多 You bet a lot with the top
而底端牌的下注越来越少 And less and less and less and less towards the bottom.
我们也可以在转牌圈大额下注后选择过牌 We can also check at a turn after betting big
只是为了观察不同类型的场景 Just to look at a different type of scenario.
因此我们可以选择这样的牌面 So we could pick like one of these boards
我们可以在这种牌面下选择超池下注 Where we can overbet.
假设我们在翻牌圈选择了超池下注 And let's say we do overbet the flop.
假设转牌基本上是一张无关紧要的白牌 So let's say the turn is mostly a brick.
现在我们的下注频率明显提高了 Now our frequency is much higher.
为什么会这样？ Why?
因为我们的牌中没有太多中间强度的牌 Because we don't have as many middling hands
这些中间牌会拖低我们的下注频率，对吧？ that drag our betting frequency down, right?
我们选择下注，在翻牌圈进行了超池下注 We bet, we overbet the flop.
所以我们已经表明我们有足够强的牌值得继续下注 So we're already saying that we have hands
对不对？ that are worth betting again and again, right?
因此，我们的下注频率整体上明显提高了 So our frequency is overall a lot higher.
接着，当我们分析成手牌和两对时 And then when we look at sets and two pairs,
我们会注意到过牌的范围显著缩小 What we'll see is that the checking range is much, much lower.
下注的频率高达80% It's betting 80% of the time.
在一个中间牌非常少的范围内 It wouldn't really make sense to have a lot of slow plays
进行大量慢打策略其实不太合理 with a range that has very, very few middling hands.
因为这会导致你的对手 Because that would just mean that your opponent
完全失去为了价值下注的动机 has no incentive at all for betting for value.
因此，这实际上是对较差牌的价值一种损失 And so it would just be losing value, I guess, worse hands, essentially.
是的，这确实是需要重点考虑的方面 So yeah, something to take into account, definitely.
你的整体下注范围无疑是关键所在 Definitely your overall betting range is the main,
你的整体下注频率是需要重点关注的主要因素 Your overall betting frequency is the main variable that you can look at.
用于指导你应该如何用好牌进行慢打 To inform how often you need to slow play with good hands.
总结一下我们讨论的内容，你需要确保理解范围之间的互动关系 So to summarize what we talked about, you need to make sure to understand range interactions.
在翻牌圈时制定一个可靠的游戏计划。记住，不要盲目地范围下注或过牌 On flop and have a solid game plan. Okay, don't forget to not just knee-jerk range bet, knee-jerk.
不要凭本能随意行动，要考虑范围和对手的打法 Check, knee-jerk, do this or that. Think about the ranges, think about how your opponent plays.
理解为什么某些选择的EV高于其他选择。最重要的是要明白 Understand why certain things are higher EV than others. The most important thing is to understand.
为什么某种选择优于另一种选择，然后通过训练来提升你的 Why something is better than the other thing and then just train, training your.
在实战中应用这些概念的能力 Your ability in-game to apply those concepts.
了解对手的习惯并针对他们的具体弱点进行攻击。这是我常强调的 Learn about opponent's tendencies and attack their specific weaknesses. This is something.
这是我非常常强调的，同时也要理解其中的主要区别 That I stress very, very often and understand the major difference when the.
最大的区别在于，当你在不利位置玩牌时 The major difference is when playing out of position,
特别是在转牌圈，需要避免让自己的玩法过于明显 especially on the turn, in order to avoid playing face-up.
在不利位置时，玩法很容易变得过于明显 It is very, very easy to play face-up out of position.
为了避免让自己的玩法过于明显 And to be able to not play face-up,
你需要了解解算器如何处理 you need to understand how the solver overcomes
那些让人感觉非常别扭的牌局 those spots that just naturally feel bad.
每当你遇到这样的局面时 Whenever you're in one of those spots that,
我觉得我的打法过于明显了 I feel face-up.
我感觉我的牌可能会被逼弃掉 I feel like I'm going to get just blown off my hand.
看看解算器是怎么解决的 look at how the solver
解决这个问题 Deals with that issue
通常是通过 And it's usually going to be by
使用边缘牌进行游戏 Playing middling hands
采用最直接的方式 In the most obvious way
也就是选择过牌 Which is going to be checking
有时进行小额下注 Sometimes betting small
还有 And
通过使用强牌 By using strong hands
来保护自己的范围 To protect
这些范围 Those ranges
如果有问题的话 If you got any questions
记得在聊天中提问 Make sure to ask them in the chat
我会尽量回答你的问题 I'll make sure to answer them
感谢大家的观看，希望下一期能再见到你们。再见啦，朋友们 And to everyone else, thanks for watching. I hope to see you in the next one. Goodbye, guys