[MUSIC PLAYING]
Is it possible that ancient civilizations may have
possessed advanced technologies?
In this episode, we explore that probability.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
So now, we've established that the universe creates
through the structure of the vacuum.
That the structure of the vacuum spinning
produces the material world from the very small
of the sub-Planck to the Planck to the protons to the atoms
to the planets, the stars, the galaxies, the super clusters,
the universes.
And that universes are birthing each other
as they emit particles.
And we've established that in this creation structure
of the structure of spacetime, we
end up with planets around stars everywhere.
That stars most likely have planets around them
that form as the result of the fluid dynamic vorticity that's
being generated in the structure of spacetime around them.
And that many of these planets could host life.
And certainly, that that life could
be millions of years ahead of us in their technical development.
Which would mean that they most likely
have discovered how to interact with the structure
of spacetime.
With the structure of the vacuum to open wormhole,
to travel through black holes, to go across the universe,
to emerge on this side of our galaxy and discover our planet.
We briefly looked at the history of man.
And talked about how there is some evidence that there
was contact with advanced civilization in our deep past
in an era that now people are starting to call
the pre-cataclysmic era.
Approximately 10,000 to 12,000 years ago,
before the Great Flood, which most likely corresponds
to the meltdown of the last Ice Age.
This flood that was reported by over 300 different cultures
all around the world talking about the end of an earlier
civilization that was very advanced that was destroyed
by a great cataclysm that involved a rise of the ocean
and the flooding of all of these ancient civilization.
When the ancient people talk about this advanced ancient
civilization, they talk as well of their capacity
to fly in the air.
They talk about their capacity to travel in the solar system
at least, if not in the galaxy.
And to have interaction with beings from the stars--
star beings or sun gods.
This is consistent in a very strong way all
around the world from all these different civilizations, which
supposedly had no contact with each other.
The probability that that would occur if these events were just
fictitious, that all of these civilizations around the world
would have developed the same myths, never mind built
similar buildings, is very low.
Talking about the way they built their buildings,
none of these civilizations claimed
to have built some of these remarkable pyramidal structures
that you find all around the world.
A few decades ago, we only thought
there was a few of these buildings,
these pyramids around the world, most known ones,
the ones in Egypt, the one in Teotihuacan in Mexico.
You know, some of the ziggurats in Iran and in Persia.
Now, we have discovered many, many more pyramids
all around the world.
In some regions, we've discovered thousands
and thousands of them.
We found some in China.
We found some under the water near Japan.
Recently, using LADAR technology that
can see under the foliage in southern Mexico
and in Guatemala, we've found thousands and thousands
of pyramids were present, which would
require that millions and millions of people lived there.
I believe that we are starting to discover
the evidence of this earlier civilization
that the ancient civilization talked about.
When they talked about those buildings,
they didn't show themselves building them.
There is no hieroglyphs, for instance, in Egypt,
on any wall in Egypt, that showed
them building the pyramids.
They all said that the sun gods came from the stars
and built these buildings on our planet.
And taught the humans at the time
how to calculate, how to engineer, how to write,
and so on.
There seems to be a common theme when
we look all around the planet in all of these traditions.
It's very similar.
And it's remarkably consistent.
One of the most obvious similarities
is the engineering that you see in Peru
and some of the engineering you see
in Egypt, some of the engineering you see in Turkey.
There's many different places around the world where
you have these enormous stones that were moved,
that were placed with precision that
exceeds anything we have today.
And when I talk about enormous stones, some of them
are smaller, in excess of 20 ton, 30 ton.
Some of them are much larger in excess of 200, 300 ton.
Sometimes moved across valleys and mountain range.
Certain places in Peru where walls
with blocks that exceed 100 ton to 200 tons
are found that were quarried in mountain
ranges across from where they're found.
So that the rocks would have had to be quarried
at the top of these mountains, brought down into the valley,
and up another mountain to be placed where they are.
And some of the stones, for instance,
at the Valley Temple in Egypt, are 200 tons blocks
that come from fairly far away that
are lined with 100 ton granite blocks that comes from hundreds
of miles away.
And the cut of these blocks is remarkable.
Some of the blocks actually exceeds 1,000 tons.
1,000 ton block are extremely difficult to move.
And yet, they've been moved across very large distances,
hundreds of miles across rivers.
And in the case of some of the stones that
are found in Egypt, for instance, at the Ramesseum
Temple, where a statue that was thought
to be a statue of Ramses II is found,
that weighs in excess of 1,000 ton.
And that comes from long distance from where it's found.
And some of the monuments we see around the world
may be from a much formidable age
than what they are thought to be today.
And actually, the archaeologists dated them
with the later people that found them.
And that used them in their culture
because they thought they were the monuments of the gods.
And that they built a whole religion around it.
But these monuments may pre-date this culture by a long shot.
In fact, they may come from pre-cataclysmic flood.
And so they may exceed 10,000 to 12,000 years.
And in some case, be as old as 30,000 to 40,000 years.
Some of the geological evidence on these building
supports these claims.
Why is this important?
It's important because that means the history of humanity
is vastly different than what we think it is.
In fact, there is evidence that the human genome may not
be the result of linear evolution
from monkeys to eventually Homo sapiens.
There is all of a sudden, a huge spike,
which is thought to be missing link
in the evolution of, for instance,
the cranial cavity of the Homo sapiens from the Neanderthal.
These changes that occurred don't
seem to be part of a natural evolution.
All of a sudden the cranial cavity doubling in size.
The brain doubling in size.
The eyes are getting bigger.
The loss of hair.
All this stuff doesn't seem to be in the natural evolution
of human beings, the result of natural transformation
as a result of adaptation to the environment.
But actually, that there was an intervention
that changed the genes of the structure
of the evolution of our planet.
And all of a sudden, produced a being
that was much more advanced.
That might have been the result of the splicing of genes that
made this sudden transformation of the evolution of hominids
all of a sudden producing the Homo sapien.
Which may have taken much, much longer
without this intervention.
And I completely off track?
Am I the only one thinking this?
Is it completely crazy ideas that extraterrestrials
may have come to our planet and altered
or even see that life on our planet?
Francis Crick, one of the most venerated geneticists
on our planet, the man that received the Nobel
Prize for discovering the structure of DNA,
wrote papers in 1973 talking about this.
Panspermia theory suggests that life on Earth
did not originate on our planet, but was transported
here from somewhere else in the universe,
perhaps spanning galaxies and solar systems.
Microorganisms that were unintentionally
distributed by space dust, meteorites, asteroids,
and comets landed on Earth and started life here.
Crick thought that this theory was improbable.
But he wrote that it had to have been implanted
by advanced civilization that came to the Earth
and then planted the genes that produce life on Earth.
Or at least, some of the genome structure on our planet
was altered to produce the evolution we see today.
Others, like William Brown, one of our biophysicists
and molecular biologists at the Resonance Science Foundation,
was able to identify the specific alteration
of the gene that happened that produced
the doubling of the cranial cavity of the Homo sapiens
from the earlier hominids.
When he discovered this, it looked highly suspicious.
It looks like an alteration of the gene that
is typical of what we do today when we alter genes
in GEMAL type of engineering.
And so it may be that not only this advanced ancient
civilization may have been on our planet
prior to our written history, but that this earlier
prior civilization was the source
of the eventual evolution of Homo sapiens on our planet.
A few years ago, I was fortunate enough
to be able to do an autopsy on some remains of mummies
they are found in the Paracas region, where
I was able to test some of the tissues
that I was able to sample from these remains.
For the first time, we were able to get
from these remains not only mitochondrial DNA,
but as well, the nuclear DNA.
Because the material was very malleable still.
And I had retained a very high level of coherency.
And so nuclear DNA was able to be extracted,
although the samples were approximately 2,300 years old,
according to the carbon dating we did.
The mitochondrial DNA, the DNA of the mother
showed some alteration and dilatation of the DNA genome
that placed strangely the origin of the race of the mother,
not in the Paracas region, but in the Black Sea region.
And so the Haplogroup of that genome source
was not localized in South America.
In that region of the Black Sea, is found,
as well, elongated skulls that resemble very much the Paracas
skulls.
So that's interesting unto itself.
But when we analyzed the nuclear DNA, or the father's side DNA,
has a very low percentage match to the human genome.
So far, we haven't finished the analysis.
And we should get it done as well by third party.
And so I cannot certify these results.
But so far, preliminary results show
that the percentage match to the human genome
is in the ratio of 3% to 5%, which is extremely low.
For instance, a banana has a match
to the human genome of almost 40%.
So 3% to 5% match is nowhere close to a Homo sapien.
So this means that they might be,
if this is correct, if the analysis was done correctly,
this might be something that was a branch of hybrids that
had human contact and maybe extraterrestrial contact
as father and mother.
And that this branch of hybrid survived all the way
into almost first century AD.
And we can attribute some of the buildings
and some of the traditions that we
have all around the world about contact
with these higher extraterrestrial being
or with hybrids, which is, as well, in these tradition.
They were called semi gods.
They were the sons and daughters of the intermix between the sun
gods and the humans.
This is described in many of these tradition.
It's even described in the Bible where the sons of gods
come to the Earth.
They find the women of men beautiful
and have children with them and so on.
So is this a possibility?
As a scientist, you have to look at the data objectively.
The data around the world is overwhelming.
The consistency across all these civilizations, traditions,
and morses describing this is remarkable.
The building consistency and techniques is remarkable.
The advanced technology required to move
such large masses for long distances
and their capacity to assemble them
in buildings with the level of precision
that exceeds what we have today is remarkable.
The evidence is overwhelming.
It's really important to be skeptical.
Skepticism, however, is different
than close-mindedness.
One must analyze the data and come
to the appropriate conclusions.
And in this case, the data is telling
a story vastly different than the story we've
been told about the history of humanity
and the development of the human genome.
Why were these people building pyramids?
Why this shape ?
How come we find this all around the world?
It's hard to say.
But definitely, the pyramidal structure, the pyramidal shape
have the capacity to concentrate electromagnetism
at their vertices, at their apex.
That has been measured now clearly.
And as well, we have a relationship
to the resonance cavity of spacetime,
which, as I've described in our equation,
is tetrahedral in nature.
Edge to edge tetrahedral relationship
produce octahedron cavities.
Octahedron cavities are pyramidal shape structure.
So it may not be a coincidence that these very specific shapes
are found all around the world, from all
these different traditions if the source of the knowledge
was coming from the same source, which
was the sun gods that were traveling the world educating
the humans.
Are these building technologies?
I believe they're part of a technology.
I believe that they are missing the heart of the technology.
They're missing the power source at the center.
When we look at complexes, like Giza, or when
we look at Saqqara, or other complexes, such as Teotihuacan,
or complexes like you find at Chichen Itza,
and so on, you see that there is some plan that
went on there in the way they arranged the buildings.
And the way they arranged the resonance cavities at Saqqara,
for instance, with these large diorite boxes that
are found under the ground that would
be like resonance cavities.
And when you look at this as a map from above,
they almost look like electronic circuits
that you think might have been the development of a very
advanced civilization city kind of structure in which energy
was transmitted throughout the city in a different way
than we transmit energy today with cables and poles and so
on.
Where the energy is transmitted through resonance
cavities across the land.
And through water structures, as well,
that are found all in these regions,
where water was flowing through pyramids and so on.
All kinds of direct relationship and analogy
including the orientation of some of these buildings
on the planet.
You would have to have a global knowledge
of the structure of our planet to be able to place.
So all this tells us that, yes, these
could have been the remains of advanced technology,
but that we're missing the power source that
used to be in them to light up all this technology
around the world.
Where did it all go?
If they were all here.
Was a simple cataclysm, like the end of the last Ice Age
be enough to wipe out evidence of such
an advanced civilization?
I believe so, absolutely.
The rise of the waters during the last Ice Age
was in meters and meters covering the land.
There was most likely impact of a large meteorite
that produced the meltdown of the last Ice Age.
And the destruction of a civilization even parts
of continent is very plausible.
So we are discovering the evidence
of that earlier civilization.
It's not like it's not present.
It's there.
There's thousands and thousands of pieces of evidence
all around the world.
It's just that they haven't been put together
because of our fragmentation of science,
because of our tendency to say, oh no, this is this tradition.
And it's got nothing to do with this tradition.
And they had no contact with each other, all this.
We have maybe misinterpreted much of day evidence
that we had discovered earlier, but there's more and more
evidence emerging everywhere on the world right now.
From the galactic perspective, it's
easy to see our world as unified.
It's easy to think of all the humans as brothers
and sisters of one planet.
From a limited perspective of an individual
on one piece of the continent delimited by artificial lines
that we have called countries, and the cultural differences
that we see between these countries,
it's difficult to see the unity in our endeavor.
Although, this is becoming easier
with the instance of internet than the exchange
of information.
And people traveling across the world.
And realizing that a family in Africa
has the same aspiration and the same love for their children
than a family in Canada or a family in the US.
We are just starting to realize the unity in our endeavor.
And discovering a larger community
that could involve a whole galactic structure
would help us unify our human endeavor.
Unify our differences.
And realize that we are all one culture that's
part of a larger cultural structure that we could
call our galactic community.
Which is most likely part of a larger culture that
could be the cluster, the local cluster, or the super cluster,
even the universe.
And so what's important to remember from this episode
is that not only are we not alone in the universe,
but there is a lot of evidence on our planet
that our planet was visited early on in our history.
That it even developed very advanced culture
and civilization on our planet.
The remains of which are present all around the world.
And that we're discovering these remains.
And it's not just one thing, like the pyramids of Egypt,
or the pyramids at Teotihuacan, but that we're
discovering thousands and thousands
of these different structures all around the world.
Stones that were too large for us to move even at this time
and so on.
That gives very strong evidence that there
was contact with advanced civilization
long before our written history in this last 5,000 years.
And that the rediscovery of this knowledge
can lead humanity to a whole new way of interacting
with itself and with the rest of the galactic community.
[MUSIC PLAYING]